The REAL current ladder

[Azkatro]

I run a picking site and have come to the conclusion that the current "official" Premier League ladder is wrong, wrong wrong! I'm going by the one displayed on sportingpulse.com.au (linked off nswrl.com.au) which is also basically "copy and pasted" into Big League magazine.

It has a few issues, I'm not really sure why they've got it so wrong but if you actually analyse the numbers there are numerous errors. For example look at the Knights - it suggests they've won 7, lost 7 and had 3 byes. It's quite wrong - they've lost 8:

1. Supplementary round vs. Rabbitohs (32-47)
2. Round 2 vs. Tigers (30-38)
3. Round 7 vs. Bulldogs (14-28)
4. Round 9 vs. Roosters (10-14)
5. Round 10 vs. Tigers (14-26)
6. Round 14 vs. Eels (24-31)
7. Round 15 vs. Sea Eagles (12-28)
8. Round 17 vs. Roosters (12-42)


Team Pl W D L PD Pt
1. Eels 16 13 0 3 197 30
2. Jets 15 11 0 4 93 26
3. Raiders 15 10 0 5 80 24
4. Roosters 16 10 0 6 145 22
5. Bulldogs 16 9 1 6 50 21
6. Sea Eagles 16 8 1 7 25 19
7. Tigers 16 8 0 8 -10 18
8. Knights 15 7 0 8 -15 18
9. Dragons 16 6 2 8 -7 16
10. Bears 17 6 0 11 -104 14
11. Rabbitohs 17 5 1 11 -123 13
12. Cougars 16 4 1 11 -193 11
13. Magpies 15 3 0 12 -138 10

 

[girvie]

Yes the ladder at nswrl.com.au is wrong, and so is Big League. They left out the results of a Parramatta/Newcastle match.

LeagueUnlimited has the correct ladder http://stats.leagueunlimited.com/index.asp

Ive sent nswrl an email about it but they dont listen.

 

[Azkatro]

Yeah I noticed after I posted the LU one is correct, initially I thought it might be wrong but I made the deduction that each team will only get up to 4 points for byes.

 

[girvie]

Yes there is a maximum of 4 points from byes.

 

[Johns Magic]

I run a picking site and have come to the conclusion that the current "official" Premier League ladder is wrong, wrong wrong! I'm going by the one displayed on sportingpulse.com.au (linked off nswrl.com.au) which is also basically "copy and pasted" into Big League magazine.

It has a few issues, I'm not really sure why they've got it so wrong but if you actually analyse the numbers there are numerous errors. For example look at the Knights - it suggests they've won 7, lost 7 and had 3 byes. It's quite wrong - they've lost 8:

1. Supplementary round vs. Rabbitohs (32-47)
2. Round 2 vs. Tigers (30-38)
3. Round 7 vs. Bulldogs (14-28)
4. Round 9 vs. Roosters (10-14)
5. Round 10 vs. Tigers (14-26)
6. Round 14 vs. Eels (24-31)
7. Round 15 vs. Sea Eagles (12-28)
8. Round 17 vs. Roosters (12-42)


Team Pl W D L PD Pt
1. Eels 16 13 0 3 197 30
2. Jets 15 11 0 4 93 26
3. Raiders 15 10 0 5 80 24
4. Roosters 16 10 0 6 145 22
5. Bulldogs 16 9 1 6 50 21
6. Sea Eagles 16 8 1 7 25 19
7. Tigers 16 8 0 8 -10 18
8. Knights 15 7 0 8 -15 18
9. Dragons 16 6 2 8 -7 16
10. Bears 17 6 0 11 -104 14
11. Rabbitohs 17 5 1 11 -123 13
12. Cougars 16 4 1 11 -193 11
13. Magpies 15 3 0 12 -138 10

I like this ladder better

 

[Red Bear]

Only 4 points off 8th...

 

[yappy]

doesn't matter which way you cut and dice it for me.

 

[Snoop]

Only 4 points off 8th...

Only 4 points above dead last.

 

[girvie]

Only 4 points above dead last.

No. 8 points.
http://stats.leagueunlimited.com/index.asp#NSWRL

 

[yappy]

even if they were only one point out of dead last they'd be safe from the spoon. It'll be black and white in 05 I'm afraid to say. How the hell does a team that won a game 70-14 also get the spoon?

 

[Jeffles]

Is the NSWRL ladder still out of date?