BLM01
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,893
Maybe but they have more cap pressure elsewhere especially Ponga on 1.4m highest paid playerI don't necessarily disagree but I think RCG would've been good for us. As some have pointed out, he's not some special front rower, and we needed more to compliment him, but for our squad I think he would've been good. Now if the Broncs are offering him 3 years then that is just plain dumb, but I would have to assume it will also be 2 years.. meaning we just missed out because we were too slow and dumb in getting something done. D Saf does not improve us enough either, is known as a lazy trainer and player, and will not provide the same level of experience to our younger guys as someone like RCG. The sticking point for me with D Saf is this: the only front rower that will be going to market that improves us significantly himself is Leo Thompson, so he is who we desperately need. If we go back to the table for D Saf, all we do is help the Knights keep Thompson. There is now basically no one available to compliment D Saf in a front row partnership that improves us enough to be a threat. We will be no more than a team sitting between 6th-10th spot, whereas complimenting someone like Thompson with another decent front rower takes us higher up the table. D Saf + Thompson would be good, but considering they're from the same side, it won't happen. Knights will just end up keeping Thompson if D Saf signs anywhere else.
That is why they want to get rid of Brailey Elliott and others
RCG would be fine for us but DS can be turned to improve whichever way you think he is lacking on or off the field by a good strong coach as us young enough
It happens sometimes and don’t we know it when someone is overpaid fir too long
RCG has reached his peak and the only way is down
Thompson will stay regardless him and JS would be their only decent props left