Nutz
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,432
I agree. When the Broncos cannot come up with a plausible and thoroughly acceptable explanation, they will ignore these things and not respond to emails, letters etc. They decided that they wouldn't sack him ages before the NRL served the breach notice and then banned him for 9 weeks. The Broncos has the muscle to get their way if they want to keep a marquee player. Anyone else and maybe, goneski.
Hey David, I'm disappointed with a lot of the shenanigans that go on in modern day sport because often the players keep doing similar offences and fail in their role model duties.
If a player is released by a club, often that player gets picked up by another club.
What we don't want is our kids to hope that their player doesn't miss a game simply because they like or support him.
Instead, the governing authority needs to set an example by making consistent rulings where the punishment fits the crime.
Many years ago I was young and dumb and got caught for DUI. I felt upset at the time only because I got caught but what I should have been thinking was what if I killed someone, a boy perhaps.
I was in the Army at that time and the Military Police found out and reported me.
That resulted in me being charged and I lost 2 years superiority (I couldn't get a promotion) which cost me thousands of dollars.
After I eventually got my life back together I made absolutely sure that I'd never, ever do that crime again.
I was convicted and punished twice, once by the civil courts and once by the Army. I was in a position of trust and I was punished by a consistent authority. Standards and the safety of the public has to be maintained.