R&WTILLIDIE
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,707
Good point. You got me there.How do you know he didn't?
Good point. You got me there.How do you know he didn't?
The union being dragged in has no relevance to wether he is right or wrongYeah, thanks for posting firstly.
Secondly, it seems to be an interaction, that is to say, a single event of some description and perhaps we can assume whatever was said was perceived to be exceptionally unkind and unwarranted by Molo.
So I think he’s upped the ante and wants the staffer sacked which the club is refusing to do nor will it release Molo, recognising his talent.
So if it’s a matter of staffer v Molo, the club has to weigh up the relative value of each to the project ahead.
It could be that the staffer was in the wrong and we know our players are quite a sensitive lot underneath. If level 5 kindness is expected in your workplace, NRL players expect a level 7. Just how they are.
I note the union has been dragged in, so he’s kind of going more public with it which means he’s confident about his case whatever it is.
These footy players have their clubs by the balls. If you are a decent player, and don’t like where you are, you can break your contract and be picked up by another club. Not enough talent going around.So he doesn't get along with someone in the workplace? That's it? And bcs of that he is going to throw his team mates, their families, the club and its supporters under the bus? And he waits until the worst possible time to do it?
He must have grown up in a sheltered little world.
Yeah, but I didn’t argue that.The union being dragged in has no relevance to wether he is right or wrong
You are saying he is confident in his claim ie thinks he is rightYeah, but I didn’t argue that.
I suggested that if he’s brought the union in, then he’s willing to let more people in on the issue. So he’s confident about the justice of his claim.
You could well be right, but I think he would invite the union in himself wouldn’t he or do they have a standing invitation in these matters?You are saying he is confident in his claim ie thinks he is right
The union would come in either way
They are there to advise either way
Yes, but conversely he may be entirely correct in the action he has taken. They are employees / contractors and they have the same workplace and human rights as others.These footy players have their clubs by the balls. If you are a decent player, and don’t like where you are, you can break your contract and be picked up by another club. Not enough talent going around.
As a workplace you always ask a person to bring a representative when you are having a conversation that could determine their work futureYou could well be right, but I think he would invite the union in himself wouldn’t he or do they have a standing invitation in these matters?
Would the club invite the union in? I don’t think so, but happy to be corrected.
The more material we get, the more in the middle I’m heading.Yes, but conversely he may be entirely correct in the action he has taken. They are employees / contractors and they have the same workplace and human rights as others.
Cheers.As a workplace you always ask a person to bring a representative when you are having a conversation that could determine their work future
There would be a section on dispute resolution in the EBA
I hear you mate. He may be entirely correct. As an example, I work in a company that, if I was to not turn up to work for 10 days, regardless of the reason why, I wouldn’t be working at that company anymore. And no other company would put their hand up to take me. Why? Because my skills aren’t in high demand like a regular first grader.Yes, but conversely he may be entirely correct in the action he has taken. They are employees / contractors and they have the same workplace and human rights as others.
Bringing in the union just turns up the heat. It says nothing in support of the justice of his claims or the truth of his assertions.I suggested that if he’s brought the union in, then he’s willing to let more people in on the issue. So he’s confident about the justice of his claim.
Mmm, I said he was confident in the justice of it, not whether or not it was right because I don’t know.Bringing in the union just turns up the heat. It says nothing in support of the justice of his claims or the truth of his assertions.
That aside, are we all starting to see how important it is that the people who are brought into the club have no issues in their background? Why must every mole hill be blown up into a mountain? With his background, we did him a favor by taking him on, and here now are our thanks.
I was in favor of getting Lodge before. No longer. I have changed my mind about troubled types. I no longer want anyone with any kinds of problems anywhere near the team.
That is usually how Flanno does things. But he may still want to keep that slot open.Presume the club will be on the lookout for a replacement, but won't release Molo until they find someone suitable.
You are confident that he is sincere. This reflects well on you.Mmm, I said he was confident in the justice of it, not whether or not it was right because I don’t know.
Thanks.You are confident that he is sincere. This reflects well on you.