saints4ever
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,959
Michael the decent one whos done nothing wrong.
Hes just not very good for NRL first grade
Hes just not very good for NRL first grade
Haaa I’m confused who we trying to offload to super league, Michael, Frank or both?
Michael. The suggestion was that we signed him as a sweetener to extend Frank. If Frank is intent on pissing off, no need to extend Michael again.Haaa I’m confused who we trying to offload to super league, Michael, Frank or both?
It's the FAFO rule in operation. Frank can explain to Michael why he is being moved on.Michael. The suggestion was that we signed him as a sweetener to extend Frank. If Frank is intent on pissing off, no need to extend Michael again.
Ludicrous recipe for disaster.
By 2026 we will have bunch of young gun forwards who got a few - or more - runs in 2025.Lawrie was terrible in 2024, but was descent in 2023. I just hope he improves this year. I think he has the potential, but time will tell. If he was un signed I would not sign him, but we are stuck with him for now. If 2025 is just as bad them I think that should be the end. I am hoping that he has a good year because we are short on quality in his position.
Agree it was 100% desperate. I think Flanagan's concern was we were struggling to sign anyone at all at the time and he needed a few hard head squad players for 2025. And also Michael started the season looking quite good for a few games so maybe worth the risk. At the end of the day he was cheap and there weren't many alternatives. Now there are.When we extended Michael Molo I couldn’t quite understand it at the time felt like a desperate move.