I appreciate how you feel Possm but a change of ownership is not necessarily the answer. Its not about who owns the club but more about how its managed.
The current Board and management have to go, there are too many favours, relationships etc to try to determine who is a good guy and who is not. There are two problems with this, one is the possibility of losing some of the history and DNA of the club and the second is new management may not be any better ( just look at David Smith and John Grant).
The biggest thing to be fixed is the governance of the club and the imperative need to break the undemocratic, dictatorial rules that have been put in place to protect the incumbents. The fact that these rules got through in the first place is a sad indictment on the members who voted for them at the time. Unfortunately, these rules now make it almost impossible to address the problems. I dont know how the changes needed can be effected but I suspect that if the NRL were serious they have enough leverage to insist/enforce that the governance issues by fixed. The question then becomes why haven't they done anything? They know the fans are unhappy about it, the club is losing members, fans at games are falling and the club owes the NRL substantial money.