Chachi
Bench
- Messages
- 3,068
why in particular? Or is it a personal thing?shear_joy said:Hinchcliff is rubbish
why in particular? Or is it a personal thing?shear_joy said:Hinchcliff is rubbish
Chachi said:why in particular? Or is it a personal thing?
I honestly don't really know what to say to that. You've named a couple of young guys whose form has been far from consistent this season, complaining about having a coach who doesn't get out on the piss with them before games. 90% of the team live in each other's pockets around Bruce, yet apparently there is no socialising. Every freakin report about the Raiders I read in magazines talks about how all the young fellas hang out with each other every day.hotdogs said:i'm not speaking for ALL but lets just say a fair few, and its not the PL boys complaining about henry its the ones playing in FG fulltime!!! apparently its a very stale environment to be in. theres no socialising eg BBQ's, bonding sessions-apparently a lot of them say henrys too much of a disciplinarian...and in saying that i went down to the lighthouse last wednesday and bronx and them were all pissed down there, and lets just say thats not the first time i've bumped into them down there on a wednesday night, before a game!!! i spoke dane tilse at all bar nun one night and thats exactly what he said aswell.there are a lot of guys just not enjoying both the onfield and off field goings on. i met up with a couple of them a few ago at the yass game and they were saying how they've never had a coach before that don't hang with them and doesn't talk to them apart from about training and footy!
in regards to tony bloody allen, i've known the guy for a while before he became the coach and he's one of those guys you either like him or you don't and he's the same with you...i've heard from a couple of boys that they actually think he's a bit racist. but he's a typical teacher-talks far too much and when you think about it a lot of our Pl boys have played FG and probably know a lot more than what he does which is frustrating for them.at the beginning of season he was asking all the questions and they were telling him what to do. i was talking to one of the staff at the game on the weekend and they couldn't believe he'd gotten the job for u/20s. apparently him and henry are bestmates which says alot!
Chachi said:I honestly don't really know what to say to that. You've named a couple of young guys whose form has been far from consistent this season, complaining about having a coach who doesn't get out on the piss with them before games. 90% of the team live in each other's pockets around Bruce, yet apparently there is no socialising. Every freakin report about the Raiders I read in magazines talks about how all the young fellas hang out with each other every day.
If some of these boys were half as committed as their coach our club would be top 8 no worries. If they'd prefer to hit the piss with Matt Elliott or Nathan Brown or that knockabout party coach Ricky Stuart then go for it. This story mirrors other things I've heard and it sounds like the attitude problem isn't with the coach.
Bay56 said:I understand where you are coming from Chachi but in actual fact it is a fine line that a coach must navigate in relation to the social side of things.
Go too far one way and you have a bunch of disgruntled players, too far the other and you have a team of pissheads.