ibeme said:Front-Rower said:This is a good one, how many people do you see at a Sydney Swans game when they are getting beat week in and week out, about 3 men and their dogs![]()
Why don't you tell us? From what I've seen it drops to about 20000 when they're not doing well. Twenty years ago they would have been lucky to get 5000
doctor death said:For those (Manly supporters) who say the CC had their chance with the Neagles - RUBBISH. the CC fans knew that Manly shafted the Bears and voted with their feet - a great gesture.
ibeme said:PB said:ibeme said:What future do you see for the game if we give up on expanding the game into Vic, SA and WA, and actually shrink our borders? We'd end up like Rugby League in the North of England - strong in a small area, but with little relevance in the rest of the nation.
I am not saying that i want the Storm or Warriors to be punted, but would shrinking our boundaries be that bad?
AFL is not played in any other country in the world, yet look how successful it is! if you only have minimal resources, and try to spread them across too broad an area, you will effect the quality of your final product.
We'd lose sponsors by shrinking our borders. The AFL would encroach further into our fringe areas, and we'd be under more pressure to pay players. We have to aim for growth, or we will be going backwards, and running out of money fast.
As for spreading too fast, that's a matter of management. We have to work our way into these areas and persist, as AFL has done in Sydney and Brisbane.
Front-Rower said:ibeme said:Front-Rower said:This is a good one, how many people do you see at a Sydney Swans game when they are getting beat week in and week out, about 3 men and their dogs![]()
Why don't you tell us? From what I've seen it drops to about 20000 when they're not doing well. Twenty years ago they would have been lucky to get 5000
Umm I did tell you :roll:
Also Ibeme how can you prove that the Melbourne Storm provide sponsorship for the NRL when NRL teams such as Wests Tigers can not find a sponsor. And another point how ironic it is that Telstra, the sponsors of SUPER LEAGUE would not support the NRL, if what was claimed is true, if Melbourne (A Murdoch aligned club) was not included in the competition????
All this about having a national competition is like Super League revisted and Murdoch's super dream of having a world wide competition LOL and ET stating he wanted to walk down the main street of China and be recognised![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In my opinion the worst thing that has ever happened was when the NSWRL handed over its competition to the ARL to control. Since then, just because of the words Australian and National, every one wants a national competition just for the sake of it. Why sacrafice quality for quantity??
Front-Rower said:ibeme said:Front-Rower said:This is a good one, how many people do you see at a Sydney Swans game when they are getting beat week in and week out, about 3 men and their dogs![]()
Why don't you tell us? From what I've seen it drops to about 20000 when they're not doing well. Twenty years ago they would have been lucky to get 5000
Umm I did tell you :roll:
Also Ibeme how can you prove that the Melbourne Storm provide sponsorship for the NRL when NRL teams such as Wests Tigers can not find a sponsor. And another point how ironic it is that Telstra, the sponsors of SUPER LEAGUE would not support the NRL, if what was claimed is true, if Melbourne (A Murdoch aligned club) was not included in the competition????
All this about having a national competition is like Super League revisted and Murdoch's super dream of having a world wide competition LOL and ET stating he wanted to walk down the main street of China and be recognised![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
In my opinion the worst thing that has ever happened was when the NSWRL handed over its competition to the ARL to control. Since then, just because of the words Australian and National, every one wants a national competition just for the sake of it. Why sacrafice quality for quantity??
PARRA_FAN said:I reckon Melbourne needs someone like a Daniel Anderson or Eric Watson.
Look at what they did to the Warriors in 2001.
joshreading said:OK, Here is the token Melbourne Storm fan, What a load of inbred garbage. Lets look at the FACTS. Telstra said they wouldn't sponsor the NRL without Melbourne, this is the case with alot of sponsors.
Melbourne is still making a loss but it is smaller than most Sydney clubs, imagine the day when the Tax from the Pokies comes into effect seeya Parra BYE BYE. Parra without the Leagues Club run at a loss as do ALL the NRL Clubs with the exception of Brisbane, New Zealand and Newcastle. I guess we better kick all the other NRL clubs out.
And 'we should relocate them' not kick them out some say, that is the stupidest thing, do you honestly think that Central Coast and Melbourne have anything to do with each other, the Storm tag would not keep it.
The perception of growth determines sponsorship potential, if we cut we look stupid and see ya to sponsors.
Tha facts are people who call for the Storm are the same who call for Souths to stay, HELLO hypocrisy. Don't give me the tradition, that doesn't equate to competitiveness or credibility otherwise Newtown and half the Qld Cup teams shouldd be in the NRL.
With the next TV deal the NRL wants the NRL grant to match the salary cap and I think that would put pretty much everyone above the water line. We all survive.
Ohh.. no interest in Victoria. I guess the Five hundred thousand that watched the Grandfinal who have been drawn thanks (in the most) to the Storm is no one. Vic is hard territory and it is pathetic shortsighted wimps that will bow down to the AFL who atleast along with the ARU have strong vision. The NRL seem to be developing this also, unfortunately some fans are incredibly shortsighted.
LETS GET CREDIBILITY AND GO BACK TO A NSW QLD COMP!!!! yeah that is just incredible logic![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()