- Messages
- 45,959
It's a big risk to sell your club to someone for an indeterminate amount.
who'd do that anyway?
oh...
It's a big risk to sell your club to someone for an indeterminate amount.
What's hilarious to me, you're a troll but your so damn bad at it. In your delusional head selling to Crowe was somehow a bad move when it's almost universally accepted that it has been the right decision, that he and HaC have done a good managing the club. Off the field it has grown in every way possible, from crowds to members to sponsorships to turnover, less debt, profit. The list goes on.who'd do that anyway?
oh...
What's hilarious to me, you're a troll but your so damn bad at it.
In your delusional head selling to Crowe was somehow a bad move when it's almost universally accepted that it has been the right decision,
Off the field it has grown in every way possible, from crowds to members to sponsorships to turnover, less debt, profit. The list goes on.
...
I think in the long term a lot of clubs will go private and in part it'll be because of the good results we have got from it.
He'll guarantee the club receives a minimum of $10 mill per year in sponsorship revenue. It currently receives around $7 mill. Tinkler needs only tip $3 mill a year at the moment.
That's why I said without sponsors...
But who thinks that he will tip in only just enough every year?
He will want the club successful and do his best to ensure that whether it means 5mill on top of sponsors or $2.
1. I swear this idiot isnt meNewcastle should just hurry up and take the 100m. No way are they worth 33 times more than the greatest club, so stop the carry on and Take Maney, the f do!
Newcastle should just hurry up and take the 100m. No way are they worth 33 times more than the greatest club, so stop the carry on and Take Maney, the f do!
http://www.theherald.com.au/news/lo...vy-of-rugby-league-world-tinkler/2051474.aspx
From Nathan Tinkler himself
Yeah, especially considering you need 75%. Most people seem to be supporting the deal but you never know if you can get 3 in 4 of the people that choose to show up. I know with souths it only passed barely by just a handful of votes.Here's hoping the Knight's accept the deal...but for some reason I'm not holding my breath, I can see some of the member's derailing it #-o
Why should he. He's been doing that for years. Why should he give his money but with no real power on how it's spent. Just like Crowe and the pre 2006 days.If he loves the club he should put his hand up for ceo and sponsor the team instead of trying to own it.
If the want to become a powerhouse like souths they won't knock back this offer.
Why should he. He's been doing that for years. Why should he give his money but with no real power on how it's spent. Just like Crowe and the pre 2006 days.
Yep and its only the Knights...:lol:May I remind you its only January ...... :lol: