emjaycee
Coach
- Messages
- 14,889
Not at the expense of Joash and TDS he hasn't, which was the claim.Jason Ryles, by elevating Lussick to the named #22, and retaining Hawkins there as well?
#amirite
Not at the expense of Joash and TDS he hasn't, which was the claim.Jason Ryles, by elevating Lussick to the named #22, and retaining Hawkins there as well?
He's not a 6. Never has been, never will be. I don't care which halves coach they bring in. He's a fullback. A backup one at that. Would kill it in the UK as a 1.well they didn't say he was going to be the next Kenny did they?
they said that he hasn't had the opportunity of an off season training as a 6, are they wrong?
I've actually got some positive vibes about him, it also wouldn't surprise me if Ryles brings a specialist halves coach in over the summer.
He's not a 6. Never has been, never will be. I don't care which halves coach they bring in. He's a fullback. A backup one at that. Would kill it in the UK as a 1.
yeah, 3 or 4 games at 6 at NRL level isn't a particularly great sample size to work of but the point is he's not had the opportunity to work on that part of the game....he was given the ' sink or swim ' apprenticeship.. you may well be correct but I'll reserve my judgement until I see what he can do in March or April next year.
not the halves coach I was hoping...
although he's still a beautiful looking man.
Cronks a freelancer now as he has finally been paid off by the Roosters...
Just go to the best, Matty Johns......I'd definitely bring him in for 6 months...fo sho!
And it was the first game with the whole spine.....yeah, 3 or 4 games at 6 at NRL level isn't a particularly great sample size to work of but the point is he's not had the opportunity to work on that part of the game....he was given the ' sink or swim ' apprenticeship.. you may well be correct but I'll reserve my judgement until I see what he can do in March or April next year.
Na, he knows his stuff. When he isn't joking around and simply talking about "halfback" play, it's quite interesting. But it's blended in with a lot of other stuff...Matty Johns does individual coaching of players for free.
I find a lot of his takes overrated though.
I don't think anyone claimed that had happened...?Not at the expense of Joash and TDS he hasn't, which was the claim.
#amirite
Na, he knows his stuff. When he isn't joking around and simply talking about "halfback" play, it's quite interesting. But it's blended in with a lot of other stuff...
He was also the one who identified Cronk as a potential half option and worth developing (which he was involved with).
He did alot with dyl. Sometimes dyl was 1st receiverRealistically how many times does Moses link with our no.6 in a game?
Not enough I reckon.
I don't think anyone claimed that had happened...?
Hawkins in #18 and Lussick in #22... I'm hopeful both will be late inclusions in the game day side - at the expense of Papalii and De Silva.
Not so hopeful about the result this week, think we'll get smashed by a team with their eyes on the prize of playing finals footy, while we're trying out potential combos for 2026.
Na, he knows his stuff. When he isn't joking around and simply talking about "halfback" play, it's quite interesting. But it's blended in with a lot of other stuff...
He was also the one who identified Cronk as a potential half option and worth developing (which he was involved with).
The original claim was that someone had suggested Lussick and Hawkins at the expense of TDS and Joash, not that they had been selected and this claim is true... someone did suggest it.I don't think anyone claimed that had happened...?
The original claim was that someone had suggested Lussick and Hawkins at the expense of TDS and Joash, not that they had been selected and this claim is true... someone did suggest it.
EDIT: and now I understand why you are defending it - you were the one wanting Lussick and Hawkins in and TDS and Joash out.
The original claim was that someone had suggested Lussick and Hawkins at the expense of TDS and Joash, not that they had been selected and this claim is true... someone did suggest it.
EDIT: and now I understand why you are defending it - you were the one wanting Lussick and Hawkins in and TDS and Joash out.

