taipan
Referee
- Messages
- 22,500
Woods99 said:I have never heard of a sport being killed off by the injection of huge amounts of money. Even cricket seemed to survive the Packer revolution.
Growth from a small base is easy, wouldn't you say?
The NRL is the biggest impediment to the growth of international league at the top level, plus the fact that there doesn't appear to be a legitimate, credible, international body in charge of the international game.
The Sydney and Brisbane club competitions are a helluva lot stronger now than they were before the game went professional.
So there is a former Wallaby who made lots of money out of the game. Did he make it by playing for Australia, or in Australia? Of course not. That is the point that I made...rugby union was genuinely amateur in Australia, while it was professional, either in cash or in kind, in all the other major countries playing the game.
Taipan, players who are good enough to earn an income from professional sport have a tendency to go where the money is the best. The money was better in rugby union in France, so the better players tended to gravitate towards rugby union. That is what happened.
As for the Vichy government, I have never denied that they confiscated the assets of rugby league, or whatever else is alleged. I have simply pointed out that this did not seem to affect the ability for France to turn out a succession of brilliant international league sides during the fifties.
De Gaulle came into power in 1961, a long time after the Vichy Government. And whatever he did, more than forty years have elapsed since then. More than enough time for any sport to make its mark.
After all, according to you, the Super League war "would have killed off any other code". And yet league in Australia is booming only a few years later?
What is the difference between here and France? Money, that's what. There is a lot more money for league here, than there is or ever has been for league in France.
Not only have I heard of PNG, I have worked there as a consultant to the PNG government. The country is a social, political, and economic basket-case. Australian aid money is going to be used to help support rugby league there, and a good thing too.
Mate, take a look back at what I said. I said that the only major country in which league is more important than rugby union is Australia. I did not say that rugby league is not played in major countries.
And, coincidentally, Australia is the only major country in which rugby union was genuinely amateur. Not only that, but league actually had far more money than it does in virtually all other market-places ( some Pommies claim that league has lots of money there, but rugby union has always had more).
The simple point is, that league is more popular here primarily because it has always been semi-professional at least, while rugby union was amateur until very recently. Hard to escape that conclusion, wouldn't you say? If there were other reasons, why don't they apply elsewhere that the two codes have been played in a serious way?
Professional tennis players were not allowed to play in the big tournaments until tennis went professional. What is the difference? Rugby union players were not allowed to play rugby league, because it was professional. As to the derision you talk about, I see plenty of that from league supporters towards the rah rahs too.
You must be doing the ostrich trick,the SL war which involved a huge injection of money nearly killed off the game in Oz.Check the people who switched codes at the time when the game was divided,potential sponsors walked ,as did many long time supporters.If it had remained divided some of the hard core supporters would have held true,but thats all.The only reason league survived was they came together plain and simple.
Ken Arthurson who I have a fair amount of respect as to his committment ,thought the game would wither and idie if the split continued and he wasnt the only one.
Mate the money in France during the early forties prior to Vichy was also in the hands of the rugby league,and the code had overtaken union for popularity.They had 300,000 francs in the bank FFS.League was more than competing with union,and in 1946 when the assets were handed over to rugby union,plus the fact that the govt only recognised repeat recognised one code of rugby -union this had an adverse effect on rugby league on the matter of govt grants,development and players .To say otherwise is plain blinkered thinking.It was the latter part of the 20th century before the govt even acknowledged them as rugby league-prior to that they were called a "game of X111 for heaven's sake.you cant get funds if the govt doesnt recognise you.Even today union clubs do their best to prevent league matches taking place on council grounds.
it still doesnt seem to get through to you that rugby league had plenty of money prior to vichy and had the lot taken.
Growth from a small base may be easy,it depends of course on "obstacles" that are deliberately put in the way.
This major country jazz :roll: Sth africa,France,GB and NZ and Australia-the biggest code in NZ thats all.When you have taken over USA,Germany,Italy,Russia,China and Japan get back to me.
Intnl RL development was moving ahead prior to the SL war,the ARL had $15m in the coffers.The Pacific islands were being targetted Fiji in particular.
If the sydney and brisbane union clubs are stronger now than they have ever been,the diminishing crowds suggest otherwise.You cant fool the public.from waht i have seen on the odd occasion,the standard is bearable.
I dont have to work in NZ as an adviser,i am fully aware of the country's predicament.Suffice to say yes Oz govt money is going there,and private backing for teams is also being injected.
The former Wallaby made money so he wouldnt switch to league,whilst he was playing the game for his country in Australia.Obviously you also have never heard of boot money in rugby union,a club on then Nth Shore had a reputation for this.
Even in the days of Messenger in union,money was available on occasions for union players .This holier than thou rubbish is just so laughable.
Hard to escape what conclusion here? rugby league is more popular in oz because for a fair swag of the population it is more exciting to watch either on TV or live.I was brought up on union,and I found this so shoot me.
After the RUWC of 2003 rugby union was according to officialdom to swamp rugby league in Oz.What happens league since then has had booming crowd increases,booming junior participation increases and booming TV contracts and sponsorships.In the UK the same thing was to happen rugby league in London is the fastest growing participation sport with juniors,and ESL crowds are at record levels.
Apparently the NZ Herald had rugby league all over its back page last week,including test posters around auckland.the rugby union final NPC in the rah rah mad country was relegated to a minor display on the inside pages.Oh and BTW NZRL doesnt have much money
As to derision I am talking about union hypocritically deriding league players for taking money,not deriding a code because of the nature of the game.There is a difference.