I'm not really sure what to make of that interview.
I'm sure Matthew Johns is absolutely shattered right now. His whole world has come crashing down. Poor bastard. I'd hate to be in his shoes.
I think that he sees he did some bad things. I think he accepts it has damaged "Clare" as well as himself. I think he genuinely would not do what he did if the opportunity was there today.
A few things bothered me though:
- the way he couched things like this: "In the statement made to police it says she encouraged players to come forward." That to me smells of a rehearsed/coached answer, and of wanting to stick to a carefully controlled version of what happened, ie what he said in his police statement years ago.
- some of his body language gave the impression of evasive behaviour, eg check his eye contact, closing his eyes and hesitating before answering. (re body language, it would be really interesting if they got one of those body language/interrogation experts to analyse his words and actions during the interview - I'd be surprised if someone in the media doesn't do that)
- there were occasions where he described things in the 3rd person, rather than as "I did, we did" etc - again this is indicative of a coached version of the events
- every time Grimshaw tried to get him to share the blame with the other players or on the NRL's culture, he deflected it and took it all on himself - he seems very careful not to expose anyone else involved.
However, all that said, I'm still at a loss what to make of it. I don't think it really advanced the story one way or another. Johns' supporters will still support him, those who think he's guilty will still think that.