News Tristan Sailor charged with alleged sexual assault

[Xcalibre]

View attachment 42828
It’s a question of whether or not he should free under the bail laws, not a guess as to whether he did it or not.

So you're privy to the particulars of the case? Nothing in the bail law suggests that he certainly shouldn't be bailed, unless you answered yes to the first question.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

In your imagination perhaps, but not what I was thinking. What you clearly were doing is supporting an alleged sexual assaulter. How about showing outrage that a young woman was allegedly brutally raped?!

You were implying something very low, nasty, mean and you should retract it.

Btw How can you show outrage about an allegation instead of a fact? You imbecile.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

How many times has Tristan failed to appear? Did he threaten a witness? Has he previously committed a serious offence?

 

[Timmah]

Btw How can you show outrage about an allegation instead of a fact? You imbecile.

The rule of law of course allows for allegations to be tested in court, but they don't just randomly arrest somebody for a crime, they clearly have a basis to charge him ffs

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

The rule of law of course allows for allegations to be tested in court, but they don't just randomly arrest somebody for a crime, they clearly have a basis to charge him ffs

Timmah im not talking about the charge, you are right, but I’m talking just the bail. The rules of bail favour the accused unless special circumstances exist. On the face of it, from what o understand, he does not appear to meet the criteria to be held.

I retract my child abuse/ sex offence comments- but not my response to the dickhead making allegations against me.

Ps They may not have a basis to charge him, but they may think they do ( to be pedantic).

But it’s close to 8% at least who are found to be totally innocent. Should never have been charged.

Bail Act NSW if anyone’s interested. @Mr Spock! hes the forum lawyer I think or at least knows something about it.

 

[Timmah]

Timmah im not talking about the charge, you are right, but I’m talking just the bail. The rules of bail favour the accused unless special circumstances exist. On the face of it, he does not appear to meet the criteria.

I retract my child abuse/ sex offence comments- but not my response to the dickhead making allegations against me.

Ps They may not have a basis to charge him, but they may think they do ( to be pedantic).

But it’s close to 8% at least who are found to be totally innocent. Should never have been charged.

Bail Act NSW if anyone’s interested. @Mr Spock! hes the forum lawyer I think or at least knows something about it.

Close to 8% innocent means 92% are found guilty. Those aren't great odds.

As for bail - without you knowing the facts of the case you're making a lot of assumptions.

Perhaps wait for the processes to take their place.

 

[Xcalibre]

You were implying something very low, nasty, mean and you should retract it.

Btw How can you show outrage about an allegation instead of a fact? You imbecile.

Whatever you reckon pal. Try to prove an implication. You can't because it's in your head.

An allegation is based on a complaint made by a complainant, and any evidence present. As Timmah said, they usually have good reason to charge someone with an indictable offense. I'd suggest it's quite easy to be outraged about an alleged aggravated sexual assault, since you'd be outraged on the belief it took place, or the mere thought of it.

Tristan like anyone else, is innocent until proven guilty, but I'm certainly more concerned for the alleged victim than him!

 

[AlwaysGreen]

Wendell seems upset

 

[Xcalibre]

Timmah im not talking about the charge, you are right, but I’m talking just the bail. The rules of bail favour the accused unless special circumstances exist. On the face of it, from what o understand, he does not appear to meet the criteria to be held.

I retract my child abuse/ sex offence comments- but not my response to the dickhead making allegations against me.

Ps They may not have a basis to charge him, but they may think they do ( to be pedantic).

But it’s close to 8% at least who are found to be totally innocent. Should never have been charged.

Bail Act NSW if anyone’s interested. @Mr Spock! hes the forum lawyer I think or at least knows something about it.

What allegations were made against you? That your outrage is misplaced? Very offensive allegation I'd imagine.

 

[The Silverdale Phantom]

Close to 8% innocent means 92% are found guilty. Those aren't great odds.

As for bail - without you knowing the facts of the case you're making a lot of assumptions.

Perhaps wait for the processes to take their place.

No choice but to succumb to process.

He was picked up at home, that knocks that criterion out doesn’t it?

He’s no flight risk and odds are long he’s threatening people.

I still reckon he will be out quickly. May have to report to cops 3 times a week.

8% is too high for mine!

 

[Chief_Chujo]

Given the seriousness of the charges I don't think he can be bailed from the cop shop. Has to go before a court.

 

[SBD82]

Is there anything worse than an MRA with poor comprehension and an internet connection?

 

[T-Boon]

No choice but to succumb to process.

He was picked up at home, that knocks that criterion out doesn’t it?

He’s no flight risk and odds are long he’s threatening people.

I still reckon he will be out quickly. May have to report to cops 3 times a week.

8% is too high for mine!

Its just police bail. He will get bail straight away when he is in front of a magistrate. Don't forget how racist NSW police are or how much they hate NRL players. No NRL player is getting police bail.

 

[T-Boon]

In your imagination perhaps, but not what I was thinking. What you clearly were doing is supporting an alleged sexual assaulter. How about showing outrage that a young woman was allegedly brutally raped?!

Why do you love alleged false accusers so much? Do you even know how much damage they do? You are sick.

 

[Timmah]

No choice but to succumb to process.

He was picked up at home, that knocks that criterion out doesn’t it?

He’s no flight risk and odds are long he’s threatening people.

I still reckon he will be out quickly. May have to report to cops 3 times a week.

8% is too high for mine!

I'll repeat, you're making a number of assumptions without knowing the case information. Suggest you tread carefully.

I think @SBD82 has summed up the rest.

 

[franklin2323]

In your imagination perhaps, but not what I was thinking. What you clearly were doing is supporting an alleged sexual assaulter. How about showing outrage that a young woman was allegedly brutally raped?!

Ahh another case of guilty without trial. You need the facts before you can be outraged. Until facts come out then can judge

 

[franklin2323]

The rule of law of course allows for allegations to be tested in court, but they don't just randomly arrest somebody for a crime, they clearly have a basis to charge him ffs

Yeah but how can you judge either way until you get those facts

 

[This Year?]

He’s implying I support sexual assault.

Be careful mate, you might also be implicated as a dragons supporter too.

 

[The_Frog]

Check your bail laws, there is no proper reason to hold him. The court will let him out in 3 seconds.

This is fairly normal procedure in serious matters. He'll appear before a magistrate on Sunday and no doubt get bail.

 

[muzby]

Maybe just a tactic to ger the Dragons to keep him

You know, if you’re going to make a joke about something as serious as sexual assault, at least get the basics right..

Like spelling..