What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Troll Dump thread

ANTiLAG

First Grade
Messages
8,014
Bevan averaged 50 because he scored a heap of runs and took it upon himself to be there at the end of the innings. He also timed a run chase better than almost anyone, and would bat as slowly as possible whilst keeping in touch with the required run rate to minimise the chance of getting out.

All time great without a doubt.

That is the myth. Reality is he scored about as many runs as Gilchrist who had to deal with the new ball, but Bevan used up a heap more deliveries.
 

ANTiLAG

First Grade
Messages
8,014
he still doesn't get it

he edits it

Another startling and insightful contribution by leagueunlimited's most esteemed moderator.

If there is ever a Pulitzer award for sports forum moderation - rest assured El Diablo will be participating in the short list at the special ceremony.

[edit] Sorry, I meant that he rides the short bus to the ceremony for special people where awards are given for moderator participation in the not quite yet potty trained.


Well done El Diablo.
 
Last edited:

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Another startling and insightful contribution by leagueunlimited's most esteemed moderator.

If there is ever a Pulitzer award for sports forum moderation - rest assured El Diablo will be participating in the short list at the special ceremony.

[edit] Sorry, I meant that he rides the short bus to the ceremony for special people where awards are given for moderator participation in the not quite yet potty trained.


Well done El Diablo.

face-confused-e1295989029455.jpg
 
Messages
4,604
[edit] Sorry, I meant that he rides the short bus to the ceremony for special people where awards are given for moderator participation in the not quite yet potty trained.

How do you know about the existence of such an award? Is it named in your honour?
 

ANTiLAG

First Grade
Messages
8,014
How do you know about the existence of such an award? Is it named in your honour?

Strange question. I am not a moderator, why would you think that
an award for moderators be named after me?

Surely you don't think that the Pulitzers are named after me?
 
Messages
4,604
Strange question. I am not a moderator, why would you think that
an award for moderators be named after me?

Surely you don't think that the Pulitzers are named after me?

For all we know you are a moderator on another forum.
Nobody is suggesting the Pulitzer Prize was named after you, only poor comprehension would lead you to think they were.
 

ANTiLAG

First Grade
Messages
8,014
For all we know you are a moderator on another forum.

I said that "I am not a moderator". I did not say that "I'm not a moderator on League Unlimited".

You asked a 'loaded' question which had a conclusion that I was indeed a moderator on this or some other forum; this loaded conclusion is in fact confirmed to me by your reply post of "for all you know I am a moderator on another forum".

You asked the earlier question with the loaded conclusion that I was a moderator before you had any support to the proposition that I was a moderator. That is very poor by you. You jump to conclusions by your own admission of "for all you know". You're not logical. Ask the question first - "am I moderator on another forum?" - then ask if it ( the award) was named after me - if answered in the affirmative. You cannot make leaps in your reasoning and still be of good logic.

Nobody is suggesting the Pulitzer Prize was named after you, only poor comprehension would lead you to think they were.

No. My comprehension was not put in question. My concerns was that possible, but surely highly unlikely as it would be so bad, poor comprehension by you could have lead you there.

What I said was "Surely you don't think that the Pulitzers are named after me?" - the subject of the sentence is you Twatface aka El Diablo.

You're boring me. Up your efforts closer to my level.
 
Last edited:
Messages
4,604
I said that "I am not a moderator". I did not say that "I'm not a moderator on League Unlimited".

You asked a 'loaded' question which had a conclusion that I was indeed a moderator on this or some other forum; this loaded conclusion is in fact confirmed to me by your reply post of "for all you know I am a moderator on another forum".

You asked the earlier question with the loaded conclusion that I was a moderator before you had any support to the proposition that I was a moderator. That is very poor by you. You jump to conclusions by your own admission of "for all you know". You're not logical. Ask the question first - "am I moderator on another forum?" - then ask if it ( the award) was named after me - if answered in the affirmative. You cannot make leaps in your reasoning and still be of good logic.



No. My comprehension was not put in question. My concerns was that possible, but surely highly unlikely as it would be so bad, poor comprehension by you could have lead you there.

What I said was "Surely you don't think that the Pulitzers are named after me?" - the subject of the sentence is you Twatface aka El Diablo.

You're boring me. Up your efforts closer to my level.

You're over analysing it.
Just like the kiwi accent sheep joke.
 

ANTiLAG

First Grade
Messages
8,014
You're over analysing it.
Just like the kiwi accent sheep joke.

No I'm not. Kiwi sheep joke was either poor grammar by El Diablo or a spelling mistake by him.

The above 'analysis' is broken down systematically for you.

Try and up your game. You may discover your potential.

Phone keyboard :(
 

Latest posts

Top