Twatface Magee
Bench
- Messages
- 4,604
Nah David Warner can afford to buy up all of NZ.
Pocket money for him.
Nah David Warner can afford to buy up all of NZ.
Oh for f**ks sake, can we have a thread where a dictionary isn't pulled out?
Pocket money for him.
I'm sure you can.
What is your aversion to dictionaries?
Laggy old m8, why are Australian fans "bogans" because they support their cricket side?
Not really, I am just basking in the pain of Australian bogans when their beloved cricket team loses.
You bogans get uber emotional about your cricket team and then look for a fight.
So much passion in defeat.
He is a former test captain he will be able to get a gig somewhere
Somewhere for sure. But he'd be wanting something a bit more lucrative than somewhere.
Well I doubt a chair on inside cricket pays that much. But if they will give a spot to Brad Haddin, then yep agreed Michael Clarke could get one there.
But if Ch 9 and Ch 10 don't want him, what high paying jobs are there left in Australia?
I highly doubt any of the Indian networks would want him; they prefer the Danny Morrison type commentators to work alongside their locals in T20 and go with the well spoken Robin Jackman type for the real cricket. Clarke has enough money already not to sell himself out as a Danny Morrison clone, and will never sound well educated enough to be a Robin Jackman type. Clarke sounds like his mouth is full whenever a word with the letter 'S' is mentioned by him.
Sky UK definitely would not. I think they want Punter don't they? I know they take Warne whenever they can get him. Although, Holding is due for a replacement. I fear that he is going senile before our very ears while while working in cricket commentary.
Safrica, NZ, WI, Pak, SL, Zim, and Ban all have no money to invest into pricey cricket commentators.
f**k, you dribble some absolute crap.
What you have posted here is an ad hominem with no reasonable argument relating to the topic.
It is the very definition of dribbling some absolute crap.
Have a good evening.
Have a cry about it.
Everything you have posted in relation to cricket in these forums has been incorrect.
This guy has a phobia of ad-hominems.
He doesn't realise that within the context we are using them they make perfect sense.
Once again, he doesn't get it. Just like everything else.
:lol:Think of the children, it was a terrible thing - poor Mitch Marsh, robbed because he was out
:lol:
I haven't been following the series closely as I just assumed NZ would win given the wickets wouldn't be flat decks, but for people that watched how did Smith & Warner go on wickets with a bit more in them?