I was talking about her past issues.You missed the bit where she said exactly what you did.
I was talking about her past issues.You missed the bit where she said exactly what you did.
I was talking about her past issues.
Between us, clearly. Now drop it.So I now have 'her past issues'
Oh dear.
If a stick has two ends, you have the uncanny knack of constantly grabbing the wrong end.I was talking about her past issues.
I am so pleased that you know me, a stranger, so well.If a stick has two ends, you have the uncanny knack of constantly grabbing the wrong end.
He was never in a million years going to be given a custodial prison sentence for his offences.He was very lucky to not be in gaol and then the fool gets back online....with accounts in his real name....dumbmerkin
It depends on the presiding judge.He was never in a million years going to be given a custodial prison sentence for his offences.
Career criminals with lengthy histories, avoid prison sentences day in day out so he was never going to prison.
It really doesn’t. They are bound by legal precedents.It depends on the presiding judge.
I don’t think he’ll get the sack. Not sure there’s enough in the post to justify a termination and given his relationship to many in the team, it’s a big call.
But the guys a knuckle dragger. That post proves he has a massive chip on his shoulder, not sure how anyone could see it any other way.
That happened in Queensland, under a different piece of legislation. You can’t draw much from it at all unless you’ve closely compared the legislation from each state.A few pages back someone mentioned close to going to jail. Almost zero chance of that.
For reference the woman released the tape with Katoni Staggs $600 fine
Teen learns fate over sex tape scandal involving Brisbane NRL young gun
McKenzie Lorraine Robinson, 18, has revealed how the footage was made public without Staggs' consent.7news.com.au
for perspective here is the judges findings
Magistrate Tina Previtera said there was no evidence of “intentional or spiteful behaviour” and the incident was a warning to all social media users.
“The evidence is that you sent this recording to one person, only one person ... this person to whom you sent the recording was the person who distributed it more widely,” Ms Previtera said.
“I do hope this is a lesson to you and all other people in this kind of behaviour on social media, that it is highly destructive.
“This recording is derogatory of more than just the victim.”
No conviction was recorded.
It really doesn’t. They are bound by legal precedents.
In the first instance he was dealt with by a local court so he was sentenced by a Magistrate, not a judge. Judges preside over higher courts ie District or Supreme Courts depending in the severity of the charges.
Persons with no prior convictions don’t get sentenced to prison terms and nor should they, assuming they are being dealt with in a Local Court.
Whatever your position is on what Tyrone May did, given all the facts, his previous good character, no prior criminal convictions he was not someone who would ever be considered for a full time custodial sentence.
I know of someone, who was facing drug charges, he, too, was a clean skin. For a small possession of ICE, he was facing a long stint in gaol. Again, it depends on the judge on the day.It really doesn’t. They are bound by legal precedents.
In the first instance he was dealt with by a local court so he was sentenced by a Magistrate, not a judge. Judges preside over higher courts ie District or Supreme Courts depending in the severity of the charges.
Persons with no prior convictions don’t get sentenced to prison terms and nor should they, assuming they are being dealt with in a Local Court.
Whatever your position is on what Tyrone May did, given all the facts, his previous good character, no prior criminal convictions he was not someone who would ever be considered for a full time custodial sentence.
Me, jelly wrestle with @Aliceinwonderland? No thanks.That meme isn't meant as in insult. It's just a "I'm strapping in for the cat fight" kind of thing. In the same vein as when I suggested you and Jane jelly wrestle a year or so ago.
The offence is quite new, there’s not a heap of precedent involved.
But given he was a first time offender you’d think it was unlikely, but 300 hours of community service is still quite a punishment. Takes a long time to work that off.
I know of someone, who was facing drug charges, he, too, was a clean skin. For a small possession of ICE, he was facing a long stint in gaol. Again, it depends on the judge on the day.
The 1st judge had a link to the Panthers and stood aside. So the judge knew he was an NRL player and would of gone harder then if a normal person was on trial
The 1st judge had a link to the Panthers and stood aside. So the judge knew he was an NRL player and would of gone harder then if a normal person was on trial
I know of someone, who was facing drug charges, he, too, was a clean skin. For a small possession of ICE, he was facing a long stint in gaol. Again, it depends on the judge on the day.