What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Vs Raiders rd 20

JJ

Immortal
Messages
32,444
Cronk calling that a soft try.

All due respect that had nothing to do with softness. Our makeshift line formed their numbering up wrong.

All our men were expecting a left side dummy half raid, they went right which exposed our bunching to the left....which as I say is a formation issue.

League teams in defence are like marching girls, if you place the marchers right they are synchronized in their patternation.

I play a lot of Chess, have done from childhood, clubs and shit, ranked and all that, League patterns are simple.

Bottom line we have to find an opening game real fast, with our fullback going off that is harder.
Not got the commentary but I expect he means soft as in ‘too easy’
 

sup42

Juniors
Messages
2,465
We need some settling sets to give us time to find our sync.

This opening is pretty much the worst case scenario I was worried about before kick off.

Raiders are taking advantage of our miss match roster at the moment.
 

sup42

Juniors
Messages
2,465
This recoverable, but we need the spine to play chess from here.

Camp them down their end. Settle the momentum. Dig in. Find our way back in.
 
Messages
17,763
6 again off scrum.
Passing to soon by CHT in backline moved. Needed to engage the line.
Kick battered back by DWZ and Raiders regather.
 

sup42

Juniors
Messages
2,465
Not got the commentary but I expect he means soft as in ‘too easy’
It looks too easy, but It was not through lack of effort, it came down to poor spacing and marking up on the opposition which is what you get with a team ripped up by injury.
 

sup42

Juniors
Messages
2,465
Horrible kick for Dallin to feild, hung in the air and dropped short.

Wahs just have to hold their line.
 

sup42

Juniors
Messages
2,465
No way Wade stripped that.

But we expect that kind of Jiggery pokery with a non Neutral Judiciary.

Fact. People are bias. All people. Which is why you never enlist your non neutrals to officiate. The courts will not admit staffers who have conflicts of interest yet some apologist gag for it for street cred in NRL forums. Hello, the law does not allow this type of set up, and is as old as the Magna Carta.

Some Kiwis being the apologist and Uncle Toms will find reason to bend over and lap that up. Not me.

Call an Aussie Spade a Spade.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Top