BuffaloRules
Coach
- Messages
- 16,348
Hope the NRL appoints a better Chair for the Bears than Marina Go at the Tigers ..
She’s go ….neHope the NRL appoints a better Chair for the Bears than Marina Go at the Tigers ..
The issue is people are clearly trying to claim that events of 30 years ago are somehow analogous to today, and insinuating that they will suffer the same fate.There was no super league was in 94 when they were already financially in the red prior to commencing on field in 95. The club was originally set up pretty well as a business in very late 92 and into 93 but something started heading south in 94 and only spiralled worse into 95-97.
In the end the costs associated with keeping them afloat far exceeded that of other bleeding clubs. To the people who were forking out the cash, it was simply irreversible. News Ltd lost faith, and as stated before in a separate post, they were on the cusp of closing Reds down for a new Melbourne based franchise months before the peace deal with ARL came to fruition.
The SL War has masked a lot of truths and embellished many false statements. Too many people to this day still run with these false statements.
Western reds had an awful ground in the waccaThere was no super league was in 94 when they were already financially in the red prior to commencing on field in 95. The club was originally set up pretty well as a business in very late 92 and into 93 but something started heading south in 94 and only spiralled worse into 95-97.
In the end the costs associated with keeping them afloat far exceeded that of other bleeding clubs. To the people who were forking out the cash, it was simply irreversible. News Ltd lost faith, and as stated before in a separate post, they were on the cusp of closing Reds down for a new Melbourne based franchise months before the peace deal with ARL came to fruition.
The SL War has masked a lot of truths and embellished many false statements. Too many people to this day still run with these false statements.
All that aside I do feel like if Perth was given a chance to steady their ship in an united competition from 98 onwards, I thoroughly believe that they would have eventually crawled into the black, financially, and then prospered. Even with the terrible commercial and operational initial start that they had. I don’t agree that their woes were irreversible, I think they only required some time to find their feet. It’s a big what if, but here we are now.
Yep good read and I meant to say Coleman, not Gibson, as per my post.
And didn't the Storm need millions of extra funding from News to survive?The issue is people are clearly trying to claim that events of 30 years ago are somehow analogous to today, and insinuating that they will suffer the same fate.
Context is everything. The mad overspend of SL hurt everyone, especially expansion teams, but the money in the game is now bigger than ever.
The Cowboys and Warriors all went bust within 4 or 5 years of the SL war also. I doubt anyone would consider them to now be a failure.
What does "member owned" even mean in this context though?For reference: this means it will likely be functionally the same as the AFL and Giants/Suns/Swans/Crows/Power. The Swans "transition period" has been going since the early 90s. The Crows will leave AFL control in 2028 (in the constitution), while no fixed dates are known for the others.
In these cases, the club is member owned, but the AFL is the only actual member with voting rights.
Yep.And didn't the Storm need millions of extra funding from News to survive?
Most clubs were run poorly and relied on grants from their leagues clubs. If News decided to save Perth and let the Storm die, we would be having the same discussion just in reverse. News probably saw Melbourne as a bigger market and hence more subscribers than Perth and decided to back Storm instead of the Reds.Yep.
Although I assume most clubs circa 2000s required quite a lot of money tipped in from their owners/leagues clubs to fund footy operations.
Because of their ownership of the game, News reported it more openly.
Unbelievable aye...Brings up another Rugby League Digest point that got brought up a lot.
Leagues clubs being set up with the purpose of supporting the football club and then all deciding they didn't want to be burdened by their exact purpose.
Which ones particularly ?Brings up another Rugby League Digest point that got brought up a lot.
Leagues clubs being set up with the purpose of supporting the football club and then all deciding they didn't want to be burdened by their exact purpose.
News Limited insisted on a Melbourne team as they didn't have AFL or any penetration into Victoria.Most clubs were run poorly and relied on grants from their leagues clubs. If News decided to save Perth and let the Storm die, we would be having the same discussion just in reverse. News probably saw Melbourne as a bigger market and hence more subscribers than Perth and decided to back Storm instead of the Reds.
News Ltd going to close them up and put their license in Melbourne to maintain 10 team comp in 98 had SL gone into a second season.
Reds were $1.4m in the red by the end of 94 before they had even commenced on the field. They were over $10m in the red by 3/4 way of the year in 97. News Ltd were spending more on them to keep them afloat than half the combined SL comp clubs. They were always going to shut shop.
What does "member owned" even mean in this context though?
Surely its NRL owned, but run by an "independent" board?
yeah thats my point. The anti-expansionist crowd have long argued that because Perth were folded up in 1997 or whatever year it was League can't be successful there, same on the Gold Coast. Those same people are always full of excuses for the Sydney clubs that folded/merged though.incorrect.
chargers and crushers were true victims because of broncos exclusivity deal in the war ending.
bears were asked to relocate, they did all the ground work and then the criteria worked against them because they had their money tied up in bluetongue stadium gosford.
i knows some here try to re-write history to fit their narrative but geez the info is literally available for all to read. maybe try doing that instead of thinking ya's some experts. newsflash ya not experts, just blokes with NFI
So using that logic since Perth Brisbane and Gold Coast got second or third chances then Sydney clubs should tooyeah thats my point. The anti-expansionist crowd have long argued that because Perth were folded up in 1997 or whatever year it was League can't be successful there, same on the Gold Coast. Those same people are always full of excuses for the Sydney clubs that folded/merged though.
how is recognised sports brands relocated to new areas a bad thing? by your way of thinking all the sports leagues in america would have half if not more of their teams gone by now.yeah thats my point. The anti-expansionist crowd have long argued that because Perth were folded up in 1997 or whatever year it was League can't be successful there, same on the Gold Coast. Those same people are always full of excuses for the Sydney clubs that folded/merged though.