Wade McKinnon

[Window Licker]

has returned home from Hull for personal reasons, possible mid season signing was a great fullback a few years back!!!

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...n-home-to-family/story-e6frexnr-1226344368059

 

[carcharias]

didn't he spit on a ref...or in the direction of?

 

[Window Licker]

yeah thats him A grade grub apparently!!

 

[RUBIKS]

didn't he spit on a ref...or in the direction of?

Are you sure it was him?

 

[Quigs]

If he is a grub .... sign him.


Cheap of course

 

[shaggs]

No way. He was terrible in his last season in the NRL.

Not even for a dollar. Would be our slowest back. Would probably also double our penalties.

No discipline and has a short fuse.

A step backward IMO.

 

[Foz]

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/sharks-doing-it-on-the-cheap/story-e6frexnr-1226344119545

 

[Special K]

do not want.

 

[Aragorn]

McKinnon use to have explosive speed. But after his leg injury, he couldn't run to save his life.

My 4 yr old son could probably out do him in a race....

 

[redback]

Absolutely not!

For the fluffies: Why not, everyone the Sharks sign turns out to be brilliant!

 

[Craigshark]

No.

 

[Card Shark]

Yes, for a low price. Brilliant on his day.

Didn't know he had a bad injury but if he is fit, get him.

 

[Frenzy.]

Never thought McKinnon offered much TBH.

How munch Kelly money to add to the $200-$300k mooted in that article?

Was Albie on incentives or a real money contract?

 

[Jedi]

No way!

 

[Bastard Squad]

Thought he was good in his day, that was close to a decade ago though.

 

[Since 73]

I had $200 waiting to be collected on an all up when he picked up a Mitchell Pearce grubber on his own line and ran 100 to score in the last 5 minutes. Dudded me.

Was in scintillating form at the warriors til a busted knee in preseason. never the same footballer.

That said.....

 

[Special K]

Matt Seers part II if we did sign him.

Frenz we were around 200k under around x-mas when flanno was looking for a back according to the papers. Hard to think Kelly would of been only on 100k

 

[Dragon Slayer]

Matt Seers part II if we did sign him.

Frenz we were around 200k under around x-mas when flanno was looking for a back according to the papers. Hard to think Kelly would of been only on 100k

Special K I agree with you.

He signed a 3 year deal with us last year.

I don't think his manager would tie up him up for 3 years on 100k per year.

Especially when there were at least Souths interested at some stage.

 

[Madsharkie]

Forget McKinnon, focus on Gordon I reckon.
Plus we've still got Isaac Gordon to come back

 

[Ads]

Wasn't Kelly on 600k over 3 years? May have been incentive based or back loaded but im sure that was the figure doing the rounds.