deluded pom?
Coach
- Messages
- 10,897
colonel_123 said:That's a problem with players playing for more then one country, not Australians playing for another country under heritage rules.
Does it matter that the Cayless brothers play for NZ despite being born in Australia? Is the NZ side held to ridicule in NZ because those players were born in Australia? Do people not go to international league games in NZ because the Cayless brothers are playing? Would less people go if the Cayless brothers were not in the side?
Of course not because the Cayless brothers, despite being born in Australia and playing in Australian (and now English) pro sides are committed and passionate about playing for NZ.
The issue is not players playing for minnow nations under the heritage rule, it's players turning out for minnow sides then playing for Australia or England or NZ when they become stars. Or established players turning out for minnow nations in a world cup then playing for a big three nation in a test match.
I'd have no problem in a young player of Tongan heritage or descendance based in the NRL or even born in Australia turns out for Tonga in the world cup, as long as that player committs to playing for Tonga, or Fiji, or Scotland, or Lebanon post the World Cup.
And the best way to do that is to continue to have regular scheduled world cups that will ensure meaningful matches (qualifiers and finals) for countries outside the big three. Having rugby league played at the Pacific games will also help to ensure meaningful matches for minor nations. Initiatives like this will encourage young players like say Sam Moa or Taniela Tuiaki to continue to play for Tonga or similar nations even in the become stars while playing for Wests Tigers. But I have no problem with them turning out for Tonga despite being based in Sydney.
I'm sure most of us agree, nail on head.