Was he held? - Tackle Rule

[northwest9]

try. play the whistle.

 

[Raiderdave]

I'll bag em deluxe when they get it Clearly wrong

" Lyons knock on V Cowboys "

" McCrone knock on V Knights "

not in this instance
the defenders went straight over the top of the ball carrier & never had hold of him

the Officials got it dead right .......

 

[Hutty1986]

Good to see a beneficial decision go to a team not called the Dragons for a change.

:lol::lol:

 

[LeagueNut]

Ridge was held...

Incorrect.

 

[_Johnsy]

Easy, the ref called play on & not one lazy Bitans player wanted to even try to tackle the player, no effort made at all.

 

[MatthewA]

Easy, the ref called play on & not one lazy Bitans player wanted to even try to tackle the player, no effort made at all.

This. Close thread.

 

[ME SO HORNBY!]

Incorrect.

Lol :lol: I reckon my uncle would of been screaming it out in his sleep for months after the 96 grand final :lol:

 

[Phantom Gossiper]

i dont think anyone would've complained if he the ref had deemed him held.

 

[_Johnsy]

You can make a case both ways for 50/50 calls.

We just do not seem to get any of them this year.
The try against STG, where a player was impeded by the Ref.
Try from the Tigers, clearly knocked on
Play the ball penalties against Parra and Roosters
No trys against Broncos Roosters, Parra, and Tigers
This held call try against Warriors

As a fan you can accept losing your fair share of these, but this has been constant all year against us, its driving people away from the game.

TBH

You need to look at the 1-17 wearing the Bitans jumpers. They are the ones who are costing you games in 2011.

 

[Iafeta]

The Titans look dreadful. I'm not a fan of refs, but the Titans look considerably worse than the worst referees going around.

Fair try. Pretty clear cut I would have thought. The merkin markers were the ones who let the Titans down, plus Campbell is getting to that point of past-used-by-date status.