what was the different in both cases??Tigers hooker Robbie Farah and Cowboys counterpart Anthony Watts have both been charged with striking after punches were thrown in Sundays clash at Leichhardt Oval although Farah is set to avoid suspension.
Farah was hit with a grade-one charge and will dodge a ban with an early guilty plea, while Watts is set to be sidelined for a week over a grade two charge after the pair traded blows during the first half.
Farah will be given 93 carryover points if he submits a guilty plea, which will ensure a suspension should he face any further charges this season.
Rugbyleaguelive.com
Why then are Brett White and Steve Price (if he wasn't knocked into next week)free to play this weekend?
.
The only other charge was Matt Utai's dangerous throw on Friday night, he got 93pts as well and with no priors can opt for the early plea and get no weeks. http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,25808304-5018866,00.html
Watts admitted himself he doesn't even know who elbowed him and whether it was intentional or not. So don't try and pin it on Farah when there's not even any footage to corroborate what Watts did. I'm fairly certain this is the first time Farah has even been cited, so don't try and make out he's a grub.Hahaha what a joke, Farah elbows Watts in the scrum so Watts belts the little grub, it flares up again later and they both go to the bin, as far as im concerned it was dealt with then.
What I was pissed off about was the referee telling Watts "you retaliated" before sending him to the bin and giving the Tigers the f**king penalty!! If he's retaliated to something then why is he the one penalised??
There was some serious home crowd refereeing decisions yesterday but in the end we didnt play well enough to overcome them, and the Tigers played well.