We’ve all been conned.

[Gary Gutful]

I just fell asleep reading that.

I thought it was a solid post. I'm going to like it.

 

[hindy111]

I thought it was a solid post. I'm going to like it.

It's reality...
There are better sides then us. But keep them down their end and your always a chance.

 

[T-Boon]

It's reality...
There are better sides then us. But keep them down their end and your always a chance.

that is the way we play. We aren't exactly the harlam globetrotters.
We are as boring as any team in the game right now if that's your thing.

 

[T-Boon]

I thought it was a solid post. I'm going to like it.

you give away your likes willy nilly though.

 

[IFR33K]

Our issue is we aren't building a game. Rolling through middle and a good kick chase. No need to go wide early. Save that once your in the rhythm of the game. Or have a nice lead or chasing one.
Play simple tight foot and we can stick with anyone I reckon. If it's close with 20 to go then try our luck pushing pass and hope the ball sticks...

Obviously it’s easier said then done. We were doing that and playing a tough grinding style. But all that went out the window. We had paulo and RCG playing huge minutes, and having a huge impact on games. Now not so much. Maybe they’re burnt out....

 

[blue bags]

*
View attachment 41385

what is that , a tit

 

[Gary Gutful]

what is that , a tit

A dicktit.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

that is the way we play. We aren't exactly the harlam globetrotters.
We are as boring as any team in the game right now if that's your thing.

We are number one in the NRL for offloads, with daylight second. We're still fourth for support runs, but I suspect that has slipped in the past couple of months. Hand in hand with our offloads is the fact we have made the second most number of errors. However the Roosters are third, so it's not necessarily a bad sign.

We are also third last (in front of only the Warriors and Broncos) for decoys but you don't need to run a lot of decoys to have good attack. However it is considered an effort area - those one percenters we always hear about. No not bikies.

We have also conceded the fewest penalties but that also means we are probably conceding a few too many quick play-the-balls near our tryline. That seemed to be the case on Thursday at least.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

How would you describe parras last game?

Unlucky. How would you describe our 12 wins?

 

[blue bags]

We are number one in the NRL for offloads, with daylight second. We're still fourth for support runs, but I suspect that has slipped in the past couple of months. Hand in hand with our offloads is the fact we have made the second most number of errors. However the Roosters are third, so it's not necessarily a bad sign.

We are also third last (in front of only the Warriors and Broncos) for decoys but you don't need to run a lot of decoys to have good attack. However it is considered an effort area - those one percenters we always hear about. No not bikies.

We have also conceded the fewest penalties but that also means we are probably conceding a few too many quick play-the-balls near our tryline. That seemed to be the case on Thursday at least.

defence, kick, defense, chase, defense , repeat defense,
where defence becomes your weapon
you didn;t mention it ounce

 

[Gary Gutful]

We are number one in the NRL for offloads, with daylight second. We're still fourth for support runs, but I suspect that has slipped in the past couple of months. Hand in hand with our offloads is the fact we have made the second most number of errors. However the Roosters are third, so it's not necessarily a bad sign.

We are also third last (in front of only the Warriors and Broncos) for decoys but you don't need to run a lot of decoys to have good attack. However it is considered an effort area - those one percenters we always hear about. No not bikies.

We have also conceded the fewest penalties but that also means we are probably conceding a few too many quick play-the-balls near our tryline. That seemed to be the case on Thursday at least.

How many offloads has daylight had?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

How many offloads has daylight had?

He was too busy scoring a thousand tries for Gateshead to worry about offloading: http://www.rugbyleagueproject.org/matches/Custom/NTctODYtLTUtLS0tLTI3NzQtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t

 

[Mr Angry]

Moses will not lead you to promised land.

 

[Avenger]

Moses will not lead you to promised land.

If the Chad did it for you then anything is possible.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Moses will not lead you to promised land.

It's a team game. We don't need to rely on Moses.

 

[Eelementary]

Our issue is we aren't building a game. Rolling through middle and a good kick chase. No need to go wide early. Save that once your in the rhythm of the game. Or have a nice lead or chasing one.
Play simple tight foot and we can stick with anyone I reckon. If it's close with 20 to go then try our luck pushing pass and hope the ball sticks...

Completely agree with you.

 

[Mr Parramatta]

We are number one in the NRL for offloads, with daylight second. We're still fourth for support runs, but I suspect that has slipped in the past couple of months. Hand in hand with our offloads is the fact we have made the second most number of errors. However the Roosters are third, so it's not necessarily a bad sign.

We are also third last (in front of only the Warriors and Broncos) for decoys but you don't need to run a lot of decoys to have good attack. However it is considered an effort area - those one percenters we always hear about. No not bikies.

We have also conceded the fewest penalties but that also means we are probably conceding a few too many quick play-the-balls near our tryline. That seemed to be the case on Thursday at least.

So what does all this mean? What’s ur point?

 

[blue bags]

It's a team game. We don't need to rely on Moses.

a defensive team

 

[emjaycee]

So what does all this mean? What’s ur point?

I think his point was that we are not/have not been the boring team that the previous poster stated. You should have read Pou's post in the context of the thread and worked out what his point was.

 

[84 Baby]

I think his point was that we are not/have not been the boring team that the previous poster stated. You should have read Pou's post in the context of the thread and worked out what his point was.

What do you mean?