pantherz9103
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,617
Raider_69 said:proven we wont be easy-beats?
i might be biased but even at our lowest of lows, we have never been considered easy beats (1982 aside), you've always had to turn up against us ready to play, occasionally ya get lucky, we play rubbish and you stroll away with an easy win but we've never been a consistant easy beat ala souths, pre-2000 warriors, or pre-2003ish cowboys etc
The Warriors were hardly an easybeat pre 2000. They finished 10th and 11th out of 20 teams in the 1995-1996 seasons, and while their finishing positions were ordinary in 97-99 they still managed to win atleast 7-10 games in each of those seasons, and often lost narrowly due to fading in the last 20 minutes.
True easy beats of years gone by were the Wests team of 1999, absolutely woeful team full of nuffies that were routinely thrashed by big margins and had the worst for and against ever. Also some of the early Cowboys team, the Crushers of 96-97 a number of Souths teams circa 95-98, Gold Coast were usually considered easybeats for much of their first life.
Even the Souths side of 2006 isn't really an easy beat, atleast not a par with the Wests team of '99. They always lose but they often put up a fight.
Some of the fans on these forums probably are too young to remember true easybeats.