- Messages
- 66,451
The current board are also yet to renominate.
We are also yet to see if there are any other nominees.
true..
another reason why it might be too premature to decide one way or another.
The current board are also yet to renominate.
We are also yet to see if there are any other nominees.
but aren't the other mob doing the same?? :?
All I'm saying is that with ellection being in April, I'd rather sit back and wait how both sides sell it to me, If the ellections were today it would be a no brainer as to who I vote for but I want to atleast give both sides the benefit of time.
Just remember we're now at the 4th of February and whilst the current board of not convinced us that they should be re-ellected, the other mob have yet to announce their ticket.
Just remember we're now at the 4th of February and whilst the current board of not convinced us that they should be re-ellected, the other mob have yet to announce their ticket.
Stagger,
We will be announcing candidates by the end of this month at the latest. I think Fish Eel wrote that there could be other nominees as well. That is correct. I can tell you as fact that there will be unless those individuals pull out prior to nominating which at this point in time I do not believe that they will. By mid to end of Feb, there will no doubt be plenty of information on all candidates that are 3P aligned. Can't stay online at the moment all. Just wanted to have a quick look at the forum before heading into the next meeting. Talk to you all tonight.
what I actually meant RAM, was that the 3P, as transparent as they have been, are still holding a fair bit of information back
what I actually meant RAM, was that the 3P, as transparent as they have been, are still holding a fair bit of information back, however, I have acknowledged that if the ellection was today than my decision would be clear cut and the 3P will get my vote.
I'm as intrigued and intrested as the next bloke to see what comes out of the campaign from both sides and tbh, I'd like to assume that it will be long hard, aggresive and spirited from both sides of the fence.
Naturally. It would be plain dumb to go releasing all the details of their campaign before it had even begun in earnest. The incumbent board can actually do things right now, so if they wanted to they could be trying to get a start on the campaigning via their actions. Haven't seen any of that so far.
Stags, I am not having a go at you here. My concern was that Ovo was doing a little political number on you by pulling you aside and telling you just quietly that they have a plan up their sleeve. Which I find quite laughable and insultingly patronizing.
If Ovo or any other incumbent board member was to have told me that, my answer to him would of been something along the lines of... "Well you should have pulled this grand plan of yours out of your arse at least 2 or 3 years ago you goose. Now you are just playing catchup to save your necks, but you are waaaay to freakin late." .
Sorry Stags, I know you would never say that to him, but that is how I feel. And just quietly, if they do release some kind of plan, how well thought out and comprehensive can it be, since up until now they didn't have a clue as to what to do?
that may well be correct but you've also got to remember the election is in 2 months time, and whilst he may of hinted that there's a plan set in place, I also want to know in due cause what the hell it is.
sure, but then he'd turn around and say, well we didn't think it was an issue 2 or 3 years ago.
just remember last election was 2 years ago and not many punters knew what impact the pokie tax and smoking laws would have on the club.
again, I'll make that call if it ever comes to the surface but as it stands they will need to work "much harder" for my vote than 3P group would..that's a given.
If everyone thought as logically as you, (and I'm not saying a lot don't)there'd be no chance the incumbants would get back into power, because frankly, I'd be surprised if they had any plan at all.
Suity
When as you suspect neither side come to us with solid answers for the entire $6mil shortfall... will you instead start to focus on what Board members you want elected based on their ongoing level of openness and communication with the average member, and their willingness to proactively organise opportunities to canvass for our ideas? Will you be able to see and admit any difference between the two "sides" thus far on that basis?
that may well be correct but you've also got to remember the election is in 2 months time, and whilst he may of hinted that there's a plan set in place, I also want to know in due course what the hell it is.
No.
Openess etc means nothing if there are no plans. "Gee, he may not have any ideas but he sure likes to meet at the Leagues Club to talk to us!" That's not a vote winner for me.
sure, but then he'd turn around and say, well we didn't think it was an issue 2 or 3 years ago.
just remember last election was 2 years ago and not many punters knew what impact the pokie tax and smoking laws would have on the club.
That lack of openness is countered by a wealth of experience.
You could counter that wealth of experience with this year's losses, but I could counter that by referencing the unexpected and changing circumstances that have led to those losses.
As I've said, at present I see no difference between the two parties involved.
Fair enough.That lack of openness is countered by a wealth of experience.
You could counter that wealth of experience with this year's losses, but I could counter that by referencing the unexpected and changing circumstances that have led to those losses.
That lack of openness is countered by a wealth of experience.
You could counter that wealth of experience with this year's losses, but I could counter that by referencing the unexpected and changing circumstances that have led to those losses.
As I've said, at present I see no difference between the two parties involved.
It was also myself that asked Ovo if he was simply "crossing his fingers and hoping to ride out the storm" which is a quote Suity has misrepresented Ovo as having said.