ed-grimley
Bench
- Messages
- 2,552
I believe the Knights and the Dogs.
Pretty bold assertion to say that they won't be big improvers, though. People aren't getting on the bandwagon because of sympathy, they're jumping on because our recruitment has been nothing short of phenomenal, and still around a million to spend.Easy to get on the Knights bandwagon because of sympathy but it's still well short of quality and experience to challenge for finals.
Top 8 maybe. Too many lesbians to go all the way.Eels are gonna win it all next season so obviously that would make them the biggest improvers
I believe the Knights and the Dogs.
Pretty bold assertion to say that they won't be big improvers, though. People aren't getting on the bandwagon because of sympathy, they're jumping on because our recruitment has been nothing short of phenomenal, and still around a million to spend.
lol, so you answered a question that the OP didn't ask. Fair enough. I think we'll struggle early as combinations are forming and it'll be whether we can make a late run at the 8 or not. I do think that a finals appearance is the goal at this point, though. The talent is certainly there.i didn't say they wouldn't be bigger improvers, just not a top 8 finish for mine.
lol, so you answered a question that the OP didn't ask. Fair enough. I think we'll struggle early as combinations are forming and it'll be whether we can make a late run at the 8 or not. I do think that a finals appearance is the goal at this point, though. The talent is certainly there.
Well you were the second reply in the thread and didn't quote anyone, so yeah I mean it's reasonable to assume you're responding to the thread and not some narrative or observation from elsewhere in the forum you've got going on in your head that you didn't at all establish context for. Doesn't really matter, just confusing as hell.Who said I was responding to op ? Generally many are including Knights in their top 8 for some reason...
They might have money to buy another big name or 2 to change that
Well you were the second reply in the thread and didn't quote anyone, so yeah I mean it's reasonable to assume you're responding to the thread and not some narrative or observation from elsewhere in the forum you've got going on in your head that you didn't at all establish context for. Doesn't really matter, just confusing as hell.
There's not really a might about it, we've still got a significant amount of cash we need to spend to get cap compliant for next season. Depending on the exact figure we've given Pearce, it could be as much as another $1 million in the pocket.