Vic Mackey
Referee
- Messages
- 25,535
My bad, I should have said, "Until Pearce, you've signed no-one but cast-offs and promising youngsters."Who are the bog standard players we've paid overs for? Origin reps Guerra and Lillyman? Moga? Ese'ese? Watson? All of these players would be welcome at most teams. We paid some overs for Ponga, a player every team in the comp would love to have on the books.
You are talking out of your arsehole. None of these players bar Ponga even had their salary announced to the best of my knowledge.
You think Brown isn't another Bellamy thenMy bad, I should have said, "Until Pearce, you've signed no-one but cast-offs and promising youngsters."
And no, Guerra, SKD and Lillyman are coming to the ends of their careers and would struggle to get a deal elsewhere Ese'ese and Watson are promising youngsters. Moga's the only one that doesn't fit either category, being too old for the youngsters and too young for the oldies. Has his moments, good and bad.
Eh, your revised statement is a little more reasonable and closer to the mark. I still don't agree with it... looking across the squads there are a lot of players that Lillyman and Guerra would play in front of in many squads. They may have been unwanted at their previous clubs, but in the context of our squad with so much youth they are worth their weight in gold. All of our recruits outside of those two would find another club easily if need be, promising youngster or not. Hell, you say promising youngster like it's a bad thing - we've collected some of the best up and coming talent in the country.My bad, I should have said, "Until Pearce, you've signed no-one but cast-offs and promising youngsters."
And no, Guerra, SKD and Lillyman are coming to the ends of their careers and would struggle to get a deal elsewhere Ese'ese and Watson are promising youngsters. Moga's the only one that doesn't fit either category, being too old for the youngsters and too young for the oldies. Has his moments, good and bad.
Eh, your revised statement is a little more reasonable and closer to the mark. I still don't agree with it... looking across the squads there are a lot of players that Lillyman and Guerra would play in front of in many squads. They may have been unwanted at their previous clubs, but in the context of our squad with so much youth they are worth their weight in gold. All of our recruits outside of those two would find another club easily if need be, promising youngster or not. Hell, you say promising youngster like it's a bad thing - we've collected some of the best up and coming talent in the country.
SKD was a recruit last year, but he's actually been great for us - and I wasn't particularly a fan of picking him up at the time.
In your opinion, which teams in the NRL have recruited better than the Knights? I'm struggling to think of one. Maybe the Roosters if you really believe Cronk is going to be a massive improvement over Pearce at club level, playing without Smith and Slater around him. I personally don't believe that, in fact I think the Roosters have shat the bed with that decision.
The point is simply that I believe our recruitment has been stellar for our needs, or by most other metrics. Vee disagrees, and I don't think there's any real basis to that. I was responding to his claim that we've overpaid a bunch of duds and promising youngsters. I just don't think that's the case. I feel like the conversation is easy to follow and you're taking it in a direction of your own again. No one is in here saying we're going to the top 4, if you follow my conversation with Vee it's pretty clear that I'm just refuting his position that our recruitment has been poor.not following what this point is...
how many clubs would they be definitely better than current starters? arguably no more than half....and guess what no more than half means?... missing out on finals. adding reasonably experienced talent to get competitive is one thing, but that adequate talent is pointless if you're competing for top 8 and trying to reach that next level, a good example is beau scott for eels, helped to make eels competitive, but now eels have outgrown him trying to get to the next level
again, i'm not disputing that they will improve, i'm questioning how far some people are claiming they will improve
I don't think Cronk is the Messiah at Easts.
Warriors will improve, they can't do any worse ... can they??
I would think any team with a million dollar halfback needs to be expecting a top 8 finish.
not following what this point is...
how many clubs would they be definitely better than current starters? arguably no more than half....and guess what no more than half means?... missing out on finals.
I dare say Lillyman and Guerra would start for the Storm next year. You backing the Storm to miss the top 8?
Dreaming
Starters are Jesse Brom and Glasby who already leapfrogged lillyman in origin, then Nas and Christian Welch who's also leapfrogged lillyman in origin
Backrow is kaufusi Finucane (2 animals) and Kenny Brom if not Hoffman, Guerra would be lucky to be ahead of Stimson tbh
Knights is a no-brainer and doesn't require much discussion.
The other team would be the Dragons. 2 rep players in Hunt & Graham joining a team full of talent and promising juniors.
I have the Dragons pushing to be in the top 4.