Coastbloke
Bench
- Messages
- 4,180
Even though it's totally unsubstantiated - aka Wiki - it's stated the 2017 ANZAC Test will be at GIO Stadium..There's been no official announcement, so hope it's wrong tbh..
There's no chance the NRL is accidentally on purpose sabotaging the game to ensure it fails and then they can pat themselves on the back for scrapping it.
Even that exhibits more thought than they're capable of.
I honestly can't understand why people think this game would be or really should be played in NZ.
The NRL is paying for the game, even to the point of topping up the Kiwis Match payments, the NRL sourced the broadcaster, the NRL will be the ones that pay the rent for the stadium, basically they are taking all the risks.
So why taking all of that into consideration would they forfeit the majority of the reward!?
I can understand arguments about growing the game and all that, but the NRL and ARLC can't be expected to subsidise and support the NZRL forever.
Either make it official and let the ARLC buy/take control of the NZRL, or stop expecting the NRL and ARLC to come in and give the NZRL a helping hand every time they need it/want it and start expecting the NZRL to at least attempt to pull their own weight in the future.
This isn't a third world country we are talking about, it's NZ, they have ample opportunity and routes to funding, even if it is only small to start.
Yep. The NRL also gains from growing the popularity of the game in NZ. The Warriors sell more merchandise than anyone, the NRL gets a good wad from the NZ tv rights and it boosts the player pool, which is going to be even more important when the bush isn't producing any players. There should be a second club there.
The NRL and 15 non-NZ clubs take all the talent out of NZ. So I don't think it would be particularly unreasonable to give something back here and there.
Basically, while the NRL drains NZ and the Pacific of all professional quality playing talent
AND uses its sheer weight to block out almost all opportunity for meaningful internationals
the NRL can and should be expected to support and grow the region.
The 'ample opportunities' you've referenced without a single example simply do not exist.
And how exactly would the NRL lose the majority of the financial reward by playing the game in NZ?
No ones saying that they shouldn't support the region, but the NRL cannot be expected to completely run and fund it either
What are these events and sponsorships they can get?
They can't play any worthwhile internationals without NRL players.
As you said, they'd be stupid to schedule them during the season (unless the NRL allows it).
Post-season the only ones likely to be profitable at this stage are England or Australia. And half the time Australia doesn't feel like playing, the rest of the time the game is played in Australia.
Who's going to sponsor an international team that never plays in their own country?
No ones saying the NRL should completely run and fund it, the argument was about whether test matches should be played in NZ. Which you're against, while simultaneously saying they should just magically get better sponsorships.
What professional events can they put on that will be allowed by the NRL clubs or the RLPA? None. Once the Kangaroos play their post-season it's all over.
Who do you believe without an official announcement?
Ladbrokes betting website now says it is being held at Adelaide Oval in APRIL, not May..
Previously Wiki said GIO in Canberra.
The NRL is just treating this match - which outrates Bledisloe - with an absolute contempt..Disgraceful..![]()