Therefore this poll is stupid and I'm not voting in it.
Its a no brainer to me. Halves have more bearing on the effect of a game, simple as that.
but you cannot tell me that a good half is not twice as valuable as a good prop can you?
Therefore this poll is stupid and I'm not voting in it.
Why are (ex. Fitz) all the Aussie players halves. Because they have a 6 or 7 on their back that doesn't make them a WBP automatically. There are some superb forwards out there, I reckon players like O'Meley and Webcke are amongst the best in the world, even players like Minichiello and Patten should be considered (not necessarily saying Bulldogs usurp position I'm trying to give examples of other positions)
Therefore this poll is stupid and I'm not voting in it.
but you cannot tell me that a good half is not twice as valuable as a good prop can you?
Who would you rather have?
A 27 year old fully fit Andrew Johns?
Or a 27 year old fully fit Shane Webke?
Its a no brainer to me. Halves have more bearing on the effect of a game, simple as that.
Why? Before this season, Jones was rated by most as in the top three with Locky and Johns.I cant believe the guy put Stacey Jones in but left out Brett Kimmorley.. And thats not being bias because im a Sharks supporter, its just common sense..
At his best, Johns is a better player than Lockyer. It's as simple as that in my mind.Johns is a way more complete player than lockyer is or ever will be.
I am of the belief that people vote for lockyer purely for the fact they dont like johns as a person, which i know is hard to do. If this was a competion of who is the best and easiest to like player than by all means vote for lockyer.