Thats where he is wrong. If they were both on the field, they would both be great at the moment. I didn't vote purely because i can't split Johns or Lockyer. One thing is for sure, i have seen plenty of past "greats" and these 2 will both EASILY be All Time Greats.Ryan_Loves_Broncos said:JJ said:Johns is the best, there's no question. I see Lockyer is leading, but that's purely because Johns is injured. Lockyer is an all-time great, but Johns is the best there is at the moment
I'd rather be an all-time great than be the best at the moment.
Mate, you are entitled to your opinion, but it is a f**king tragedy for you that you honestly believe that Andrew Ryan, Willie Tonga, Paul Rauhihi, Billy Slater, Joe Williams and Ben Kennedy are better players than both Lockyer and Johns. When these players you have named come close to dominating games consistently like the 2 i have mentioned then maybe you will have a case, but i doubt that will ever happen. Maybe Joe Williams 1 day.dodge said:Gawwwd why is it always halves. I'm sorry but this is stupid, Andrew Ryan, Willie Tonga, Paul Rauhihi, Billy Slater, Joe Williams (admittedly a half), Ben Kennedy, all better players IMO atm. I'm sick of Lockyer Johns etc gettin all the credit simply because of the 6s and 7s on their back. It's stupid and I think this poll needs to be rewritten with some options.
And Buderus? PLEASE! He didn't deserve the captaincy for NSW and his only "moment of glory" was coming within inches at the beginning of the game. Fitzgibbon, great all round player, the only player there I'd consider.
you should be the goose rather than the mooseThe Moose said:Putting brad fittler in the same category as locky and johns is a joke. freddy is a good player but most of his game is played in the second half against a tiring defence. when has fittler ever exploded out of the blocks for his team? when did he last score a try in the first half? Also his general kicking abilities I believe are poor. long kicks int the arms of the back 3, but very little variety ala the other 2. To be the best every asset of your game must be 100%. Lockyer for mine
Not exploding in the first half? That's a pretty silly statement. Best way to put it really. There are no possible stats to back you up on that and at the end of the day an opinion such as yours is exactly that, an opinion. Probably derived from bias and dislike.The Moose said:Putting brad fittler in the same category as locky and johns is a joke. freddy is a good player but most of his game is played in the second half against a tiring defence. when has fittler ever exploded out of the blocks for his team? when did he last score a try in the first half? Also his general kicking abilities I believe are poor. long kicks int the arms of the back 3, but very little variety ala the other 2. To be the best every asset of your game must be 100%. Lockyer for mine
Chicken_Hunter said:JoeysWheelchair said:Mad Dogg is right. And Chicken Hunter, you are joking yourself, seriously, when the Knights are down, Johns goes missing. Its a known fact. He goes missing. When the Knights are losing and their forwards are being dominated, then you don't even notice him. Its like Kimmorley, he was great at the Storm behind a good forward pack, but since he has gone elsewhere he hasn't had that same impact. Yet last year when he somehow made the Australian side, people started to talk about him again because the players around him gave him those chances.
However, when Lockyer's team is down he puts in, and arrives at the scene. Lockyer is definitely the best player in the world, and i'll say it time and time again that people who rate Johns as the best they've ever seen, or worthy of being an immortal then they mustn't have seen any footy during the 90's. The likes of Langer, Lewis, Stuart, Daley (to name a few) all were superb and dominated a position and games more than Johns has. Throw Fittler in there as well, he has been a dominating force who has been more consistent then Johns.
Johns is alright, but he hasn't ever achieved that dominance that other players have, and he definitely doesn't have any impact when his forwards are down.
Oh please... :roll: i would take what you say with a grain of salt.. Like you have watched many knights games.. Idiot.. Johns always tries his heart out.
Johns is an extremely consistant player.. How else can you describe our success since 1997. Why do the knights not do as well when he isnt there?
You are kidding yourself..
May i just say...
44-0 Broncos biggest loss, orchestrated by johns coming off 8 weeks on the sideline from injury.. THank you very much.