What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Who would you rather have as your Halfback? Mitchell Pearce or Johnathon Thurston

Who would you prefer at your club?

  • Mitchell Pearce

    Votes: 17 18.5%
  • Johnathon Thurston

    Votes: 75 81.5%

  • Total voters
    92
Messages
17,427
Not often you get a thread dealt with by the 4th post, but here it is



FTR, canberra with Cooper Cronk, or any top class halfback, would be a fair dinkum contender. Its the only missing link but the most important by far.


After Saturday, I couldn't agree more.
 

Liam

Juniors
Messages
1,305
I'd take Pearce because he wouldn't demand as much as Thurston and thus I could have a better team across the park.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
27,830
I reckon Thurston is overrated to a degree. That doesn't mean I think he's crap or anything, it just puts my general opinion on him in the same category as Hayne last year. He was in fantastic form, but I wasn't cracking a boner like some. Thurston is a good player, however I can't agree with some of the accolades he gets.

Don't get me wrong, I'd still have him over Pearce and over any half in the competition - for a right and realistic price. Well, maybe not actually, I'd probably take Cronk over him because I think he'd suit the Knights better.

It's funny how people on these boards complain and whine that particular players are protected species in the media yet they're guilty of having their own protected species on the forums here. Can't say a word bad about them, lol. It's also amazing how many opinions become based on reputation rather than actually watching the players play.
 

Didgi

Moderator
Messages
17,260
We have 11 current/former rep players in our squad. You have 9.
By that logic there isn't much difference.

Point taken. But people just need to look at another thread on this forum highlighting our bakcline woes. Sure we can spit the 'forwards went forward' cliche, I think our pack is quite good, but our outside backs are pretty pathetic. No half would look like a world beater with backs like that.

In summary, Roosters backs >> Cowboys backs.
 

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,552
Can't be that good of an analyst if you think farah is better then JT
rubbish. qualify your answer. there arn't many more influential people at club level in the game than robbie farah, and i'd have him in my team over thurston in a second. goes for 80 minutes and does some tackling while he's at it, too.
Thurston is a two time Dally M winner and comfortably the best halfback in the game and better than Robbie Farah and Benji Marshall. Those guys are yet to prove anything other than they are immensely talented, they haven't guided their side to a premiership although they were involved in one, and they have for the last 4 seasons failed to even make the semi finals. Greg Inglis and Billy Slater might be on their day as good but there are plently of quality centres and fullbacks in the game, not plenty of halfbacks of JTs class, in fact there aren't any.

I know many many "football analysts" that would highly disagree with you. You are entitled to your opinion but please save us the I am a better poster than you BS.
farah and benji were both extremely influential in their '05 premiership, moreso than any of thurstons involvement in the premiership he has won, and to say otherwise is foolish. the only thing left for your "arguement" is that he's won 2 media popularity awards. good on ya JT!

yes, i am entitled to my opinion and i'm also entitled to retort when someone calls me a "goose" and suggests i never post again. piss off and mind your own business on that one.
uhh..... nobody mentioned Steve Price, except you. And we weren't talking about Cam Smith, Greg Inglis, Billy Slater, Robbie Farah or Benji Marshall either.
somebody mentioned the best player for QLD the past 4 years. that player is steve price, not johnathon thurston. you may have to read my posts a bit slower in the future, but please try and keep up. i then chose to qualify my answer and where JT rates on my radar as far as "best in the game" goes. whether you agree with me or not is of little consequence. continue with your hissy fit.
Thurston is a machine. You don't have to think he's the best player, but to say Thurston goes MIA is one of the most absurd things I've read on this forum.
how often do you watch JT play? honestly? im not saying it happens every game, and he's had a good start to this season, but the bloke is a ghost out there sometimes. people seem to love it that he touches the ball in a backline movement... and the commentators certainly go ballistic, i'll admit it's quite the spectacle! as far as actual influence in those 30 minutes goes, he does sweet bugger f**k all, quite often too. sadly i don't have access to the level of statistics and replays i require to prove or disprove my hypothesis.

since i generally enjoy your contributions to the forums i'm going to leave it at that. lets just say that i disagree that it could even be in the top 1000 absurd things you've read on these forums considering the content often on display around here and your evergreen presence. slightly disappointed you chose to hyperbolise to this extent in this instance, particularly when i think you'll find theres more merit to what i am saying than may first be apparent, especially if you choose to look beyond thurstons form at the start of this season and the massive and constant wankathon from every commentary team. JT only needs to sneeze in close proximity to the ball and rabs has a heart attack.
The Cowboys have been but Thurston hasn't. The Cowboys rely on their big 4 Bowen, Thurston, Payne and O'Donnell and getting them all on the park at once seems too hard for the Cowboys. I think laying the blame on Thurston for the Cowboys inconsistency is wrong and would have him in a heartbeat over any other halfback unless I wanted to play Thurston as a 5/8 which I wouldnt mind doing but I definitely would never pick Pearce over him.

Cronk is a very good halfback but it is easy having the best fullback, centre and hooker in the game all in your side isn't it? I think it is.
can't argue with any of this, totally agree. QFT.
Of course Cooper Cronk is a fantastic halfback, let's see how he goes with a team like the Sharks or perhaps Canberra.
And of course you'd have Benji Marshall or Robbie Farah, but how good do they look without each other? Hell even in Origin Farah struggles bigtime.

Apparently Thurston's expected to do it on his own, when if some of you actually paid attention you'd realise when the Cowboys win games or do well, he actually doesn't do it on his own.
also agree with this regarding thurston, absolutely spot on. QFTx2. the part that doesn't sit right with me is that judging NSW players based on their performance at origin level the past 4 years is a completely flawed concept. QLD as a unit have been far superior to NSW across the board the last 4 years in talent and, most importantly, passion and desire to win. regardless of any of that, i have been (and still am) under the impression that we are talking about club football, and the prospective value of the players in question to their team.

it would be interesting to rate the likes of hodges based on the same criteria (i.e his debut at origin level against a vastly favoured team). i hope you can understand where i'm going with this one.

i definitely do agree with you, though... there is a lot more to the cowboys in spite of their inability to succeed without thurston on board. don't worry, as a knights fan i had to deal with similar criticism of our team for years with Johns in it... despite him being surrounded by state and international represetatives at the time. i completely relate to and understand where you're coming from.
FTR, canberra with Cooper Cronk, or any top class halfback, would be a fair dinkum contender. Its the only missing link but the most important by far.
even less relevant than things i brought up earlier, but i agree 100%.
Whilst i think you shade him, i dont think your that far ahead. Lets get real here, you're pretty hopeless
uncalled for, untrue and unqualified. the funniest thing i find about this post is that 99% of the time i agree with you, and always post thusly. not sure what this says about your own analysis of the game. perhaps you only remember the times when we've disagreed. i'm certainly going to lose a lot of sleep tonight knowing that i havent earned your approval, but thanks for the input on the subject, lol. i generally respect and enjoy reading over your opinions, because most of the time i do agree with them. interesting that you feel the opposite way, but ill keep it in mind in the future.
I reckon Thurston is overrated to a degree. That doesn't mean I think he's crap or anything, it just puts my general opinion on him in the same category as Hayne last year. He was in fantastic form, but I wasn't cracking a boner like some. Thurston is a good player, however I can't agree with some of the accolades he gets.

Don't get me wrong, I'd still have him over Pearce and over any half in the competition - for a right and realistic price. Well, maybe not actually, I'd probably take Cronk over him because I think he'd suit the Knights better.

It's funny how people on these boards complain and whine that particular players are protected species in the media yet they're guilty of having their own protected species on the forums here. Can't say a word bad about them, lol. It's also amazing how many opinions become based on reputation rather than actually watching the players play.
... and this, ladies and gentlemen, is the crux of it. the forum as a whole bitches and moans about media darlings... and yet i list a handful of players i'd prefer at my club - whilst even conceding in the VERY SAME POST that yes, thurston is the best halfback in the league at the moment... and suddenly there's a heap of fanboys and detractors ready to tell me how wrong i am about the best player on the planet right now (lol).

take it all for what you will, i don't really care... i think we can all agree (well, all bar 14 - at present - truly deluded souls) that we would prefer JT in our team over Pearce in a heartbeat. i implore everyone in this thread to hit the mute button the next time they watch a cowboys match and make up their own minds about thurston. i certainly intend on continuing to do the same, as i literally cannot bare listening to commentary when the bloke is playing... and the same can be said for jarryd hayne at the moment. i do try and give credit when it is due as best as possible, but these blokes get credit whether it is due or not, constantly, for the entirety of every match they play in.

disclaimer - i use hayne as a relatable example of a media darling as far as commentary goes, not for any basis of comparison playing-wise with the grand and unquestionable johnathon thurston. please don't post a muppet reply asking why i brought him into the bloody argument, as that is not my intention... just as it was not my intention with other names i have mentioned as a mere basis of my own comparison. yes, i rate a HANDFUL of players over johnathon thurston... what a crime!

disclaimer for the disclaimer - no, i do not rate jarryd hayne over johnathon thurston.

good afternoon, good evening and good night everyone.
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,082
I agree Thurston is overated, but it's through no fault of his own. It's through the fault of the general media who breeze through the Cowboys highlights, see Thurston and decide to write, "well Thurston carried the Cowboys...again!", and like any docile audience most Rugby League fans agree.

Truth is, if you watch the Cowboys games it's generally the work of Aaron Payne and the forwards that get the Cowboys rolling. Thurston provides the finishing touches and does a good job of it; but to say he carries the side is an insult to the club. In fact, whenever he tries to spearhead the attack he can be found guilty of trying to score off every play which ends in very ordinary results (vs. Dragons '10).

But in saying, that doesn't make Thurston an ordinary player. Oh no, he's definitely up there with the best in the current game and deserves to be rated as such as his performances since late 2004 have seen him climb to the very top.

I believe ranking players 1-400+ is a silly task and would rather put them into tiers of greatness. Thurston would easily make that first tier alongside Inglis, Smith and Slater (Hayne's indifferent form since the Four Nations has seen him fall to the category below alongside the likes of Marshall and Farah).

I don't think Thurston goes MIA more than any of the other players mentioned. Inglis is like one of those monsters from those sci-fi films, you barely see him but when you do....f**k! While Slater is probably the most enigmatic player in the game, can be a hero one minute a villain the next.

The point on Price is interesting though, would make for a good topic.
 

TheDalek079

Bench
Messages
4,432
considering Jonno "Coffs Harbour" Thurston demands a lot more money, and Pearce hasn't even reached his potential yet, I'd have to say Pearce is better value for a club.
 

johns_reds

First Grade
Messages
7,979
Can't be that good of an analyst if you think farah is better then JT

rubbish. qualify your answer. there arn't many more influential people at club level in the game than robbie farah, and i'd have him in my team over thurston in a second. goes for 80 minutes and does some tackling while he's at it, too.

How about you qualify your answer, simply saying that Robbie Farah is more influential doesn't make it so. If Robbie didn't have Benji Marshall playing with him he would be pretty useless.

Here is a few stats for you for the first four rounds as Thurston was injured from the 5th:

Thurston: Tackles: 70, Tries 2, Try Assists 6, Line Breaks 4, Line Break Assist 6
Farrah: Tackles:122, Tries 1, Try Assists 2, Line Breaks 1, Line Break Assist 2

Yes Robbie "goes for 80 minutes and does some tackling while he's at it" but Thurston has more tries, try assists, Line Breaks, Line break assists then Farah which in my opinion would suggest he is more influential then Farrah.

I'd Have Thurston over Farrah in my team anyday of the week.
 

Charlie124

First Grade
Messages
8,509
Just to clear up with some of the posters in here, the question isnt "Who is the best value for your club?" its "Who would you rather have as your halfback?"
 

Joker's Wild

Coach
Messages
17,894
Yes Charlie but the reason for picking one over the other would remain the same

Some would rather Pearce as their halfback because it would mean more cap to spend on other positions.

Not that Id prefer Pearce myself though
 

fred92

Juniors
Messages
155
Voting currently at 58-8 in favour of Thurston, lol ... one of the most dominant poll responses ever on here!
It's true Thurston is currently a better player than Pearce. I would prefer Pearce at my club than Thurston. Pearce only over the past 6 weeks has started to show the potential the club believed he posessed . The whole club had been suffering over the past 2 years under incompetent coaches which hurt performances of all players. Pearce just turned 21 this month, clubs were not clambering for Thurston at that age. So I will join the eight who opted for Pearce at my club.Brian Smith single handedly turned the club around to what should be a better year for the Roosters.
 

perverse

Referee
Messages
26,552
How about you qualify your answer, simply saying that Robbie Farah is more influential doesn't make it so. If Robbie didn't have Benji Marshall playing with him he would be pretty useless.

Here is a few stats for you for the first four rounds as Thurston was injured from the 5th:

Thurston: Tackles: 70, Tries 2, Try Assists 6, Line Breaks 4, Line Break Assist 6
Farrah: Tackles:122, Tries 1, Try Assists 2, Line Breaks 1, Line Break Assist 2

Yes Robbie "goes for 80 minutes and does some tackling while he's at it" but Thurston has more tries, try assists, Line Breaks, Line break assists then Farah which in my opinion would suggest he is more influential then Farrah.

I'd Have Thurston over Farrah in my team anyday of the week.
you're using 4 rounds of football statistics to judge who the better player is?

i think you'll find if you look over the past 3 or 4 years of statistics that, while thuston would be ahead in most attacking stats... there isn't much in it... and for a hooker farahs attacking stats are far above anyone else in his respective position. farah's defensive stats crap all over thurstons in every way, shape or form.

on the other hand, thurston hasn't topped (or even come close to topping) any stats in the halves since 2007. he is well past his peak now. even back then, how many of his try assists and line break assists were the sensational work of matty bowen, who was in stellar form back then?

so we have a hooker that is a great all round package and has been at the top of his position statistically for quite some time, versus a half that hasn't been at the top statistically for a long time and can't defend for sh*t.

i'm not going to bag you for not thinking farah is better than thurston, i understand why it's not a popular opinion, but your methods of illustrating how much better thurston is than farah only serve to prove my point of people having short memories. the reality is stats never give the complete story, although the first 4 rounds of this year do back you up, the last 3 years of history paint a different picture entirely. you can pick an arbitrary 4 round period out of any season for the past 3 years and probably have a different "better player" based on the stats.

i would prefer farah than thurston in my team, as i think he's a far more complete package than thurston. thurston, however, is the best halfback running around at the moment... and i would definitely prefer him as my halfback over mitchell pearce. i don't know why people are struggling with this one so much.
 

Latest posts

Top