i'll concede that buderus is past it if he fails to impress this year. he hasn't exactly had the best couple of years... he's been trying to polish a fair turd of a team.Raider_69 said:why is buderus in this poll? he'll be struggling to be in the top 3 hookers this, with Farah and Smith easily ahead of him already.
perverse said:i'll concede that buderus is past it if he fails to impress this year. he hasn't exactly had the best couple of years... he's been trying to polish a fair turd of a team.
it's pretty much now or never again for bedsy.
having said that it is perplexing that he's in this poll.. he's certainly not the best player in the world, and he never was.
Rabbitohs2005 said:2008 will turn some heads imo. I think Greg Inglis and Sonny Bill Williams will have outstanding years, both are fairly complete players in attack and defence.
Thursto & Lockyer has fairly poor defence, the best player in the world should be purely based on the completeness of theirs skills in attack and defence.
Cameron Smith is the best player in the world, in my honest opinion, his defence a needs little bit of work, but he is fairly solid in all aspects of the game.
Everybody looks at only attack in speculating this, it proves that by Johnathon Thurston having the 2nd worse defence as a halfback in the NRL, with only Luke Walsh in front of him.
If Joe Williams can be consistent in his attacking capabilities i mean, whats stopping him being as good as thurston based on everyones opinion as an attacking player and not as a complete player, i mean his defence is better than thurstons on record.
Thurston being the best in the world is totally incorrect. Cameron Smith o would be a good option, Farah a darkhorse as well.
Inglis needs to establish himself as a five-eighth, because like it or not, thats where his future is, when he establishes this, he will be the benchmark of the comp.
DeeGan said:Joey Williams and Jonathan Thurston being mentioned in the same sentence is the funniest thing of 2008 so far! :lol:
Making out Thurston's defence as poor to suit an argument is priceless too. Watch any Origin appearance, the guy plays well above his weight in the front line of defence. He ain't a Johns or Gower defensively (who is or has been?) though he ain't a poor defender.
Billythekid said:I have never considered Lockyer as the best player in the world cause of his defence. He is a liabaility in the defensive line and i just can't overlook this fact. Especially when compared with the likes of thurston who is a real asset in defense. Add on to this the fact that Thurston is a better attacking weapon and well to me theres no comparison.
Funny thing is back when Lockyer was a fullback he was basically the best defensive fullback around.
Rabbitohs2005 said:Ill Repeat his defence is absolutely awful...Joeys Defence is just as weak...Ill give you Gower though.
Ill bet my house, that Thurston is the 2nd worse defender for a halfback in the comp.
badav said:It doesnt sound like you've been watching much rugby league lately. Lockyer although not the most solid tackler is definetaly not a liability in defense anymore. Maybe in 2004 he was.
As for thurston. He misses just as many tackles as anybody. Not saying he is a bad defender, but to call him an asset in defense. Well its just plain wrong.
_Johnsy said:Fully fit and all things being equal
1. Thurston
2. Smith
3. Gasnier