Show's how much you know when you think Gower is there only to cover hooker. Gower can cover 6,7 and 9 better than Priddis can. That doesn't mean Gower is a better hooker than Priddis
Yeah, because Gower is likely to be subbed in for Johns or Lockyer in an upcoming game. The main reason he's there is to sub on for Buderus, have some impact, and then sub back off. I didn't see him making any such interchanges with either of the halves. He may be in the squad to cover those positions, but he's only included in the team for his Buderus rotation.
Personally I would've thought Wing was a better option, since he could have covered the injury to Tahu far better than Waterhouse did.
So pilotting his team to 10th spot was an achievement? And I suppose his hand in this years wooden spoon was comendable as well?
Nope, but the fact that we finished so strongly definitely deserves some credit. I don't recall any other wooden spooners in history, with the exception of the Bulldogs, ever being given the wrap of being one of the competition's form teams.
Currently your sig is blank which parallels your opinion perfectly.
An intelligent response, except for the fact that you're implying I don't have an opinion - when clearly I do. To highlight my point, here's this: