Ron Jeremy said:I've said it before.....it was the right decision regardless of the result, if Cronulla had knocked on from the kick off or there abouts Wagon would be hailed as a messiah, the reason why Cronulla scored is because Sullivan exploited a injured Vaealiki!!!
:roll:
Suitman said:Its simple really.
You CANNOT score points in Rugby League if you DO NOT HAVE THE BALL.
So why in the f*** would you give the ball to the OTHER team.
Who's to say we wouldn't have made a line break in the first set of six.
That was just pathetic.
Suity
Eels Dude said:Suitman said:Its simple really.
You CANNOT score points in Rugby League if you DO NOT HAVE THE BALL.
So why in the f*** would you give the ball to the OTHER team.
Who's to say we wouldn't have made a line break in the first set of six.
That was just pathetic.
Suity
Strongly disagree. It was an error of judgement. It was a brave decision which could have payed of but didn't. No use complaining about it. I can see the logic behind Wagon deciding to kick off, it didn't work out yes, but there's no need to be bitter about it.
Ron Jeremy said:A honest question for you all
Did you really think Cronulla who hadn't put much pressure on Parra all night would score in the first set of 6 in extra time??...i couldn't!!
Genius Freak said:One Sharks knock on or error deep in their own territory and the game goes the other way.