Really? Forgotten the headbutt and suspension already, just as one example? Ok...
That could well be possible. But considering those amazing performances have mostly been at wing, who was there that could be jealous that he is getting attention? Other wingers? Forwards? Maybe it's not the praise of Hayne that was the problem, but the way Hayne took the praise within the camp?
Sure. It's the job of a good coach to try and get the professional egos to cooperate as a team, for the benefit of the team. Meninga and associates must have managed this a lot better than previous NSW coaches. Kearney must've managed it with NZ better than other international coaches. I don't rate Sticky as a coach... and maybe he himself identified a shortcoming that he didn't believe he'd be able to manage Hayne's ego effectively, among all the others in the squad? Just speculating on all this (rather than rejecting it), as where there's smoke there's usually some small element of a fire....
Queensland didn't make the most of their early forward momentum, true. But you've got to give some credit to a side that hung in there defensively despite getting hammered up the middle, and believed in and played for each other enough to fight back and take the lead in the closing part of the game. The guys Ricky picked will take confidence from that, and the way Hayne has played and lifted his contributions since being left out of origin suggests that he's displaying maturity that was lacking while suspended in the month before initial Origin selection.
I hope (and assume) Hayne will be picked on the wing, and I hope (and assume) that he will fit into Ricky's camp just fine after having been left out for a game. It's not such a big deal as was made out in the media and in here - Hayne's a professional, and he's recently picked up his game and attitude as requested by the rep coach/selectors. Morris' injury makes it an easy swap - injuries aside, it will be interesting to see the game 3 selections...
I didn't forget the headbutt, but I don't believe a guy doing it in retaliation to a dog act is immature. Had he thrown a punch instead of a headbutt it wouldn't be an issue. But because headbutts are seen as taboo, it's all of a sudden immature. I don't condone what Jarryd did, but I certainly understand it, and in a way applaud him for standing up for himself. But I don't understand the connection people make with the incident and immaturity.
That could well be possible too, bartman. But I think it's safe to say that most, if not all, representative football players have an ego, especially these days (in days gone by, blokes like Hindy and Petero were from the 'old school'). And it's simply a clash of egos that leads to back-office politics and then they make a decision on who is the easiest one to punt.
I think that people misunderstand Jarryd's competitive streak and on-field arrogance (a trait that a very good player must usually possess IMO) with him having an over-inflated ego. Nobody likes players who are arrogant or cocky on the field, but when you're not playing against them, you can rationalise and think, "He's cocky because he is that damned good." Andrew Johns was not a shining light of humility on the football field. We all know Choc Mundine wasn't. But those two blokes were just better than others, and they knew it. Some people believe that that shouldn't be a reason to include them in representative sides because it disrupts the team harmony. Personally, I think you need blokes like that in your side if you are serious about being competitive - when the chips are down it's the cocky, arrogant types who will most likely put their hands up and make a big play. Against St. George on Friday night, one of those moments was Jarryd's charge-down on a field goal attempt. It saved us a point.
Yes, I certainly applaud NSW's focus and self-belief. But at the same time I am not blind to the fact that NSW were immeasurably lucky that the Maroons were slightly off their game. Had they not dropped balls or messed up plays in those opening 20 minutes, and had the score been 20-nil (as an example), I don't think that NSW would have been able to dig themselves out of the hole. But how can I tie this back to Hayne? Well, NSW's attack, up until the 70th minute, was impotent at best. Had Hayne been playing, he would have provided more options for NSW - he can run the ball and make breaks or half-breaks, he can pass, kick and offload. Josh Dugan's best attribute is his running game - all the Maroons need to do is gang up on him when he's returning a kick and they can belt him. Do that to Hayne and he can chip for himself, or throw a cut-out to his un-marked winger.
I think it is commendable that Jarryd has carried on like he has at his snub (because it was a snub) - the fact he didn't sit there and sook, like so many thought he would, IMO lays to rest any possible rumours that he has a poor attitude. Jarryd shrugged and admitted he was confused and disappointed (and rightly so), but then knuckled down and played some good footy for his club side. No fuss, no sooking. Nothing. Just playing good footy for his club. I believe the issue arising from his snubbing is simply: why would you ignore NSW's best player of the last few years, and why would you choose a bloke in Morris who has not achieved anything at Origin level? That's where the issue inflated beyond control. Had Stuart had enough decency to simply come out and say, "I don't like Hayne," instead of dancing and prancing around the issue, pretending Jarryd and himself were on good terms, then I don't think it would have been THAT big an issue - people would still have been confused, but at least they'd know that Stuart doesn't like the kid, and thus he didn't pick him (which is his puzzling right as coach).