El Duque...although I refer to the Cairns 'incident', I have heard Cairns say that the saidincident did not happen.
Still, it was good dissection... I mean discussion.
Willow, with respect...did you miss the actual debate that was happening in the thread?
I thought the issue was whether or not McGrath acted, or re-acted, appropriately or justifiably in the West Indies. I'm not sure how the authenticity of one instance of on field drama has any bearingon this issue.
So, considering we initially set out discussing theMcGrath issue, and have onlyestablished that....
a) The Cairns story probably didn't happen
b) Our Prime ministers are plonkers
How do you conclude that this is a victory for the older cousins, when neither of the two said revelations are groundbreaking or new, and the real issue has not been resolved?
Still, it was good dissection... I mean discussion.
Willow, with respect...did you miss the actual debate that was happening in the thread?
I thought the issue was whether or not McGrath acted, or re-acted, appropriately or justifiably in the West Indies. I'm not sure how the authenticity of one instance of on field drama has any bearingon this issue.
So, considering we initially set out discussing theMcGrath issue, and have onlyestablished that....
a) The Cairns story probably didn't happen
b) Our Prime ministers are plonkers
How do you conclude that this is a victory for the older cousins, when neither of the two said revelations are groundbreaking or new, and the real issue has not been resolved?