Big Pete
Referee
- Messages
- 29,078
pretty sure i asked you a question..
Did you?
Can you repeat it? I missed it.
pretty sure i asked you a question..
I am sure the QLD fans wouldn't be saying it was a try if NSW scored it like that........
I am sure the QLD fans wouldn't be saying it was a try if NSW scored it like that........
Upon further reflection I don't think anybody has any idea of what the rule truly is.
Is Farah allowed to lead in with his boot to prevent a try?
And when the ball is dislodged from Farah's boot when is it considered live?
If nothing else, at least we'll get some clarity here.
For the time being we're just spinning our wheels. Can understand the frustration, it wasn't the best way to finish the game, so we'll just wait to see if that frustration was justified.
Harrigan press conference on FoxSports
He says it's a try.
Farah is allowed to dislodge with boot.
But GI was deemed not to be playing at the ball. The contact from his fore-arm was just considered a rebound.
Journos are trying their best to twist this.
OK so the rule is established that if a ball hits your arm at any time and you are not playing at it we go with play on?
Lol this just keeps getting better.
Now you claim that Inglis had an intention of playing at the ball right up until he dropped it on Farah’s boot at which point his whole nervous system shut down and he was devoid of thought. After it hit his forearm his brain woke up and reapplied the intention to play at the ball.
You are an A grade moron.
That is rubbishHey NSW Guess What?
BILL HARRIGAN: The guy who's dedicated his entire career to the rules of NRL says:Greg Ingis had possession of the ball and was trying to ground the ball. Robbie Farah, in desperation to prevent the try, changed his running gait and threw his leg out. In doing so, he dislodged the ball, so therefore it is deemed that he played at the ball. The ball is still live. But please, keep believing it was a bad call, write a letter to him, cry yourselves to sleep. But we're going to believe the best Referee in the history of NRL over you're shitty arguments now. QLD won NSW lost -Get used to it.
Pretty sure we are used to losingQLD won NSW lost -Get used to it.
I laugh at this suggestion that Inglis wasnt playing at the ball. FFS he was desperately trying to score a try ffs - Harrigan is trying to tell us that Inglis - with a loose ball touching him IN GOAL, decided not to play at it? Point 1 of a second later he was claiming a try.
Not even Steven Hawking can change his mind and react so quick, let alone a renowned f*cking slugbrain like Inglis!
f**k you are a dumb, thick merkin.....:lol:
actually no he isnt. he just has a different opinion then you.
actually no he isnt. he just has a different opinion then you.