WWE Royal Rumble Thread *Includes Spoilers*

[lockyno1]

More interesting moves and better performers in the ring.

 

[Sanchez]

compared to?

 

[lockyno1]

MNM> Cena, Hardy>Cena.

 

[Sanchez]

what about umaga and the things that actually happened in the match

 

[Big Pete]

Sanchez, don't bother, locky isn't going to budge an inch and will never swallow his own opinion to admit Cena is a better entertainer/performer than those in the tag team match.

 

[Sanchez]

good point

 

[lockyno1]

what about umaga and the things that actually happened in the match

Umaga was good, pity the other bloke was ordinary though! I hate his character as it is just silly. The get bashed till you are almost dead, then get up and win as usual is not entertaining one bit!

 

[Sanchez]

look im not overly entertained by him either but i bow to a good match

 

[lockyno1]

I did bow to a good match- the TAG match!

 

[Sanchez]

uhhhhhhh

 

[Misanthrope]

I did bow to a good match- the TAG match!

Jesus, that match was tripe. Why did they pace a match between those two very skilled teams so slowly? Why did they bother adding the 'psychology' of focussing on Jeff Hardy having been winded for five minutes? The whole match solved nothing, and now it seems the feud isn't over.

 

[lockyno1]

Which is good. They are the best 2 tag teams around. They will always put in a good match!

 

[Misanthrope]

But they didn't...

It was a slow and predictable match which got bogged down in trying to be psychological. The Hardy Boyz should work spot-fests, not lengthy, slow paced matches.

 

[lockyno1]

Even if it wasn't their best match, it was still better than the other matches!

 

[Sanchez]

why dont you ever budge