I don't recall ever seeing someone look for distractions or excuses for a biter before. That is until you came along Timmerr.Timmah said:See, that's not funny or contributing to the debate anymore.
But, keep going.
Willow said:I don't recall ever seeing someone look for distractions or excuses for a biter before. That is until you came along Timmerr.
Timmah said:EDIT: Apparently didn't end up with a charge.
Looks like you were wrong all alongTimmah said:http://www.leaguehq.com.au/news/new...ock-over-biting/2007/08/05/1186252545736.html
Looks like I was right all along.
Timmah said:Did that article not indicate the MRC would at least look at the tackle? You'll bet your ass they did before not charging him.
dictionary.com, look up abhorrent.Timmah said:Quote where I was looking for an excuse Willow.
Your interpretation of words is abhorrent at best.
dictionary.com, look up excuse, then look up reason.
Oh dear. Looks like you were wrong when you said: "Looks like I was right all along."Timmah said:And continue to note the fact that Tahu has been earmarked in the article on the previous page and may end up with a Judic charge.
EDIT: Apparently didn't end up with a charge.
BUT!!! :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:juggalo_strit said:Tahu was definetly not to blame, but he should of been suspended for the tackle.
It's still no excuse for Morrin to bite him, but i can see why he had the sh*ts with Tahu.
Wasn't a good tackle at all. I wonder if Tahu might of got suspended if Morrin didn't react the way he did??