your test selection

[Sanchez]

he should bowl more then he does

 

[azza]

Heard on channel 9 this evening that the nuffy known as Watson has been ruled out of the 2nd test.

 

[Macca]

Hmmmm that's interesting . . .

Gilchrist to 6?

 

[Red Bear]

Same team should do fine

 

[aussies1st]

Typical Queensland softie! Just leave it to Clarke he'll take care of the all rounder role.

 

[Sanchez]

hussey could bowl a few overs

 

[borat]

I'd pick Michael Clarke as the second spinner. MacGill can play in Sydney.

Clarke can't bowl for shyte, one handy spell doesn't make you an allrounder. The adelaide pitch will be as flat as and we need Macgill cause the pace bowlers won't be nearly as effective.

I would drop Lee and Clarke and bring in MacGill and Symonds due to Watson being out.

 

[JJ]

why not the kid - Henriques? Not like you're playing a team that's going to give you much competition :lol:

Always a good idea to blood young talent against developing nations!

 

[lockyno1]

If symonds plays, f**k England will win. Same side now.

 

[Bring it home Knights]

If symonds plays, f**k England will win. Same side now.

his record isn't much different to your love child!

 

[lockyno1]

What love child is that?

 

[Twizzle]

Clarke can't bowl for shyte, one handy spell doesn't make you an allrounder. The adelaide pitch will be as flat as and we need Macgill cause the pace bowlers won't be nearly as effective.

I would drop Lee and Clarke and bring in MacGill and Symonds due to Watson being out.

I bet that was mentioned around the selection table, it was mentioned on Inside Cricket last night.

I'd say Clark did too much in the first test to allow Symonds another crack at the all rounders spot.

 

[borat]

Symonds or no Symonds they should have selected MacGill

 

[lockyno1]

No they shouldn't have. The only way Macgill would play is if you played 5 bowlers and it is just too risky as Watson is out. Plus it really lengthens the tail as Macgill dead set can't bat!

 

[Bring it home Knights]

What love child is that?

dont play dumb. It's the player you mention 20 times a day on here "Watson"

 

[lockyno1]

It could have been Haurie as well!

 

[JJ]

you've given them both hummers? :shock:

 

[lockyno1]

Nope JJ!

 

[Bring it home Knights]

not many men tend to have manly men with no shirt on as a display pic. I think it was a fair question, lol

 

[lockyno1]

That is HHH for crying out loud- WWE!