I doubt that. Peachey had silky hands.
Edrick has shown he has terrible hands.
But could a change in scenery and a change in coach Instill the confidence that Ricky seems to suck out of everyone???
"It leaves us skinny. It's just a situation we'll deal with short-term and plan for the future. We'll have to look at what we've got to do," Stuart said.
"We've got a couple of options there. It all happened so quickly so I've just got to get my head around it.
"We'll deal with it. It won't be the only piece of adversity we're going to have to deal with this year."
I'm not writing him off at all. I was merely arguing the comparison. At this stage edricks hands let him down when it mattered. He is 24. Peach would have been about the same age in 1996. He turned out ok.If you were going to write off a guy 'cause he had a shocker in a SF , the Peach wouldn't have played 1st grade again after the '96 PF against Manly.
The return of the dark sharks....not since peach and preston were carving it up have I used that one.The Blackline!
He is playing by the rules provided, and says there should be more compensation for producing players, not just Canberra, all teams, and I agree.He'd have a good argument if he hadn't gone out and brought BJ, Rapana, Sezer, Whitehead, Paulo, and Taylor in the last 3 years.
The argument that long serving players get greater cap relief makes sense. The fact that it comes from a serial sook like Stuart lessens the impact.He is playing by the rules provided, and says there should be more compensation for producing players, not just Canberra, all teams, and I agree.
eg. Paul Gallen should not be included in the cap.......
Classic!I can see lees first game will be like this
Classic!
Now why do I feel like a beer?!
Believe he trained yesterday. Possibly had a run Thursday but I can't confirm thatAnyone know if he training yet
I raise you 1x Albert Kelly playing fullback for sharks on debut.Can anyone this of a worse debut than this bloke had last night?