Brutus
Referee
- Messages
- 26,214
You mean like when they put posts up at the MCG, as EA said?
Interesting to see you on the main board and in this thread Thomas...
Well..not really.
You mean like when they put posts up at the MCG, as EA said?
I don't think shut-out is entirely the right phrase I'd use.Rugby League was shut out of Victoria, Sth Australia and Tassie for until the 90's.
Go and get some newspapers from the 80's and before and see if you can find any decent coverage of league, any news reports on TV etc.
I was in Melbourne then Adelaide for the 1975 semis 5th place playoffs. I couldn't find the results in their papers at all. I had to ring home to find out the result of both matches.
AFL/VFL results have been in the Sydney papers for as long as I can remember.
THE NSW/ACT AFL has been accused of exaggerating its registered players in the Leichhardt municipality, calling into the question the sporting body's numbers across Sydney.
Before tonight's Leichhardt Council meeting to decide whether Australian football will be played on Birchgrove Oval, the district's sporting bodies were asked to provide certified evidence of their local numbers. The local AFL body, which in its original submission to the council claimed to have 1644 registered players, then reduced that figure to 238.
''It is really disturbing that a professional sporting body would use false statistics to gain access to junior sports grounds,'' said Leichhardt councillor Darcy Byrne, who has campaigned to keep the AFL off Birchgrove Oval. ''Given these revelations it would be plain wrong for hundreds of junior soccer players to be booted off their home ground to make way for the NSW AFL.
''There are now serious questions about how many local clubs across Sydney have lost their home grounds on the back of dodgy numbers.''
Anybody surprised?
Someone get over to Big faggy with this.
The local AFL body, which in its original submission to the council claimed to have 1644 registered players, then reduced that figure to 238.
n a statement, the NSW/ACT AFL said that ''in the initial expression of interest, we used numbers that were taken from our registration using a postcode search that inadvertently included neighbouring suburbs that were not part of the Leichhardt Council LGA'', and that ''following the council's request for all applicants to resubmit their participant numbers, we discovered the discrepancy and amended our numbers accordingly''.
Anybody surprised?
:lol::lol::lol:according to Bigpoofy this will cost the councillor http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/sydney-afl-playing-numbers.963231/#post-24975491