Captain Apollo
Coach
- Messages
- 14,034
I agree with some of what you say but don't be so nieve that this is the first time players managers have held clubs to ransom. Player managers every year use other clubs/leak info to push up player/s values and if the player/s is/are big enough could potentially have a "ROLE" in the clubs future. Yes the tigers management seem to have stuffed up but it could be a blessing in disguise and actually help them in the future.
Again that comes back to club management. You mention what some player managers do, and say what they are doing is wrong, and the clubs need to be protected from it, making out like the clubs have a completely passive role in the matter of signing players. What is a player manager's job? To get the best result for their client. Their client is not a club, it is a player. This could be why the NRL were banging on about corporate governance at clubs as some club managements are incredibly piss poor at recruitment as they let the player managers dictate terms all the time because they never counter-offer but merely take whatever the manager offers.
Do you seriously think clubs like the Broncos, Bulldogs, and Roosters do business like that?