Raw for many people, not just me. In fact, anyone who supported the expansion of the game that was all f*cked by your club and Super League.
First off, before I address this point you're telling me I'm anti-expansion although I support an expansion club?
Secondly, this is some of the dumbest logic I've heard. So since I support the Broncos that automatically makes me a supporter of Super League and the impact it had on the sport itself? By that logic, I was a huge supporter of replacing Bulla with Clinton and every off-field incident that's occured. Not even a 10 year old would be as stupid to make that assumption.
Loudstrat said:
I love how you try and find the moral high ground though. Especially in a thread about match scheduling on a Friday night, which has nothing to do with you wandering off into troll territory.
Your anti-Brisbane, Melbourne and Canberra agenda has been well noted on these boards. Your posts deserved to be written off as such.
Loudstrat said:
And now you are suggesting that clubs can choose when they play?
No, but they can inform the NRL of preferences. North Queensland prefer to play their home games on Saturdays as it suits their fans.
Loudstrat said:
Besides, the Cowpats cant play away games on Friday night?
They can but there hasn't been that many opportunities.
Let me list them for you.
There was Round 4, 7, 13 and 16.
4 games in total the Broncos received the Friday night game ahead of the Cowboys away game in 2011.
And looking into it further, 2 of those games were justifiable. Before Round 4 the Cowboys had played on the Monday night and Round 7 was scheduled when the Tigers were considered one of the top teams in the comp. So really, you're just b***ing about two games. Is it really worth it?
Melbourne vs. Brisbane shapes as one of the most important games of the season and deserves it's Friday billing. If you're too petty to agree then that is your issue, not mine.