See, I don't think like a child, so I really don't care how they feel. Pro wrestling programming is rated PG13+ in Australia, which means kids young enough to actually believe it are only watching at their parents discretion. I love my pro wrestling, but you're kidding yourself if you think the current content is suitable for younger eyes. Ass-kissing, stripping, swearing, racially based characters...
Sure, characters such as The Boogeyman and the minis are clearly directed at children, but a Hell in a Cell match certainly isn't.
To me the WWE is just another soap opera. A violent, less witty version of the OC. A Neighbours with better production values.
I do understand that the whole 'faked death' thing would be disturbing for a child, but given most children don't have access to the internet to know it's 'legit' - how is Eddie's on screen 'death' any different to when the Undertaker was locked in a casket and set on fire and then came back to life on Survivor Series?
Or when Stone Cold was thrown off a bridge by The Rock?
You're arguing that children will be disturbed because they don't have access to the internet to know the details and know that it's not a real business, but you leave out that many similar angles have played out on TV. The only difference is, this one is real, but your average kid watching wrestling and believing it's real wouldn't know this for gospel. We know because we know the industry is worked and we know that Eddie legitimately died. If a kid believes wrestling is real, then they believe that Randy Orton killed The Undertaker and that Triple H dressed as Kane to **** a dead girl.