Noise
Coach
- Messages
- 18,676
So far with Parramatta he's only proven to be a half-season player.
So has de gois.
So far with Parramatta he's only proven to be a half-season player.
That i understand, Peats plays above his weight and is a mad merkin and a 20 min rest wouldn't do him any harm at all. What i don't understand is the calls to bring IDG on and then move Peats into the pack which will weaken us from dummy half and in the back row.
If people can't see that Peats can do more in 80 minutes than he can in 60 then I give up.
Cheers mate. All the best.
If we rest peats for 20 min that is 2 less interchanges we can use for our bigger men who prob need the rest more.
Leave him on, let IDG do the work for a 20 min period and refresh peats during that.
It's not a stupid idea and a few teams tried it this year, and the Aussie team is currently doing it
Rep teams are a poor model because they don't have to worry about a salary cap.
Cameron Smith is a lot more versatile (and bigger) than either of Parra's hookers, and Hunt offers more out of dummy half than Smith (the man he comes on to replace) and De Gois (the closest analogue in our set up).
I assume Peats can play middle half.
There's no such thing! There's a half and a five-eight, and that's all there is!
Hey Pou, that's a good explanation. Why do you think not many players can make the quick decision to either play short or long on the open shift?
I think there are prob more edge forwards that could (eg sonny bill, Glenn Stewart, Mateo)but they are better suited to the edge for a variety of reasons.
Where as Sef Paulo (also a ball playing back rower) can't defend well on the edge. If sef could defend on the edge do you think we would play him there rather than in the middle?
There's no such thing! There's a half and a five-eight, and that's all there is!