Why nup? We will see and you will eat your words. We are witnessing the greatest ever tennis player. People like McEnroe are also stating it and Nadal is now no match for him. Nadal even stated himself that he has never seen anything like this since he has been playing.
?I played against a player who did everything perfect. I know nobody playing tennis like this ever. Since I know this sport, I never saw somebody playing at this level. ?When I say perfect, it?s not one thing in particular. It?s everything. If not, it?s not perfect.?
What would he know? He made Federer his bitch and made the little Swiss watch cry.
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/01/raf...ying-perfect-tennis-better-than-roger-federer
Rod Laver, Ken Rosewall, Pete Sampras, Rafael Nadal even Djokovic himself have labelled Federer the greatest of all time. Even last year in Djokovic's prime, McEnroe labelled Federer the greatest (switched from Nadal) due to how he's dismantling everyone on tour bar Djokovic (still beating him in two 500s) at the age of 34. Why? Because he's the complete, timeless player who would succeed in any era. Djokovic is an excellent player, but limits himself to relentless baseline defence ala Nadal, and may one day eclipse him. This works wonderfully in the age of slow courts and balls but it's not something that would have been effective even 10 years ago. Personally, I think it's one of the reasons he's not as popular as some former number 1's - no signature attacking play. Just returning straight and deep. Effective, but unimaginative.
Just remember, Federer is 10 seasons past his prime and is making Grand Slam finals. A f**king decade later and he knocked off the World #1 2/4 times last year. That's ridiculous. Let's see if Novak is doing that at 34.
As for your other post, it has nothing to do with him being Serbian. He's in the prime of his career but people must remember he's yet to eclipse the records of many players. Just because he's not the greatest doesn't mean he's not great. He is.
