Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Starling is no better than Tyrrell
We already have roughly 2 million tied up in the burgess twins, sam and Musgrove. We can't afford to sign top line middle forwards. If we sign guys like vaughan, moa or douglas we'll be dedicating half our cap to one area. We need some cheaper reliable forwards, who would mostly play for the bears, but can come in when our top liners are injured and get a job done. Someone like starling, who wouldn't have many options this late in the year and would be available dirt cheap, would be the type of player we need. We can't have a squad of 25 full of stars unfortunately
It's off zero tackle and I can't post that link on here as it won't allow me too.
He was on 950k but they are paying 750k of it and with what SOUTHS are offering he will be on about what Hayne is on for 2017.
Correct alien.
Probably about 450-500k.it says he'll be on around $1,200,000. so what the heck are we paying him in 2018???
I didn't want us to pay him over 300k.
That's the article I quoted earlier in the day. It still seems very ambiguous to me. How does it make sense that he is owed 950k for next year, Tigers are paying 750k and for absolutely no reason we decided to pay not just the 200k that he is owed to make up his full salary, but also an extra 250k. Why would we do that? He isn't owed 1.2 million so why would his total salary for next year equal that? If the Tigers are indeed paying 750k and we are paying 450k then we are f**kin idiots!
