The_Shield
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,895
5 of 7 of players to challenge a shoulder charge charge have gotten off, or something like thatThe judiciary ignored the rules.
That is exactly what happened.
Do you believe any other player qould have got off?
5 of 7 of players to challenge a shoulder charge charge have gotten off, or something like thatThe judiciary ignored the rules.
That is exactly what happened.
Do you believe any other player qould have got off?
5 of 7 of players to challenge a shoulder charge charge have gotten off, or something like that
Well it’s all about applying the rules consistently. If Tedesco does a cover shoulder “bump” on someone like slater and as long as there no penalty then it will be fine.
What everyone really is uncomfortable with is that there is a rule for one and not another (slater has been protected his entire career for some reason) and if there should be different penalties for finals.
Piss funny that people are still feebly trying to maintain that his arm was 'involved' in the tackle. Get the f**k out of here, the movement of the arms is essentially a natural reaction to the hit & the arms either by muscle memory or physics appearing to move to grasp the other player when it was plainly obviously that he never had any intention of tackling the player in any conventional way. It was a shoulder charge, the judiciary were hoodwinked by a clever lawyer & Billy ' I'm Protected, Suck Shit ' Slater got off. Once again.
You don’t deserve a response comparing a normal game to an origin game.Where was all the outrage when Latrell Mitchell was not even cited for his shoulder charge on Slater in Origin 3?
https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www...ter-gets-smashed-latrell-mitchell-bunker/amp/
Short memories.
You don’t deserve a response comparing a normal game to an origin game.
Why are all these troll accounts suddenly popping up this week
Either can you!Jesus Christ, give it a rest. You can’t stop can you?
So in other words, you got nothing. Ok let me explain again why he got off. For it to be a shoulder charge there must be no use of or attempted use of the arms. It’s been well documented here multiple times that Slaters arm are involved in the tackle. Therefore it cannot be a shoulder charge. It’s a technicality sure but that’s just how it is. It’s similar situation to both the Jack Whighton tackle and the Mick Ennis one, a technicality in the way the rule is written means that technically it wasn’t a shoulder charge. It will stay that way until the rule is changed. Have a nice day
Except The Shield. He didn’t get the memo.Nope. We are just sitting back enjoying all the salt in here.
Except The Shield. He didn’t get the memo.
No. I’m just helping keeping it goingExcept The Shield. He didn’t get the memo.
You know for someone who doesn’t like me, you sure do like to talk about me a lotWell he is a f**king moron. Our version of IBM.
You’re not doing all the heavy lifting though. You have had plenty of help to be honest.No. I’m just helping keeping it going
True. It’s fun to argue with people here, everybody takes everything so seriousYou’re not doing all the heavy lifting though. You have had plenty of help to be honest.
