His comments on 360.
Saying banners at the game aren't necessarily the right environment for the fans to vent their frustration.
He said it's not a good look.
Neither is the shit our team has been dishing up.
He said Mary loves the club and can coach.
I love the club but that doesn't mean I can coach.
If he loves the club do what's best and say adios.
So the "members" have no say or way of influencing the make up of the Board.
They are stakeholders in name only.
Fans sponsor the activities of the club financially and have no constitutional standing.
So what avenue do the rank and file St. George supporters have to express their opinion or influence the direction of the club?
The answer is nil.
So when fans unfurl protest banners at the game, that is also not allowed.
Even the banners being displayed are hardly offensive or derogatory.
"Fail Mary", "Step down McGregor" and so on are pretty tame and any objective club official would not be concerned under normal circumstances.
"Oust Doust" was on display for years without any official reaction whatsoever.
Why is the club so sensitive all of a sudden?
Graham coming out in unequivocal support of McGregor on TV is just more spin.
Everyone at the club keeps telling us that McGregor can coach.
We are told to stop reacting and to get behind him.
Fans should just do as they're told.
The club patronizes the fans continuously and treats them with contempt.
I am really stumped as to how the powers that be continue to blindly support McGregor.
On what basis?? What are their criteria??
Maybe if they could outline their reasons for such staunch support and back them up with rational proof, we could all share in the glow that surrounds McGregor's tenure?
I suspect however that their stance is indefensible by any measure.